@simple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoQualcomm will try to have its Apple Silicon moment in PCs with “Snapdragon X”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1171arrow-down14 cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partytechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1167arrow-down1external-linkQualcomm will try to have its Apple Silicon moment in PCs with “Snapdragon X”arstechnica.com@simple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partytechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-square@hackitfast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoHere’s an archive of all Windows updates and builds. This query is for arm64. https://www.uup.ee/known.php?q=arm64
minus-square@hackitfast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoFrom a security perspective, as long as you check the hash against Microsoft’s website then it should be okay. Otherwise I’m not sure where to get Windows on ARM ISO’s from.
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThat’s my point. Microsoft doesn’t seem to want you to outside of the surface
minus-square@hackitfast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI mean yeah you’re not wrong. If only the Surface wasn’t so absurdly overpriced for what you get.
Where’s the installation iso?
Here’s an archive of all Windows updates and builds. This query is for arm64.
https://www.uup.ee/known.php?q=arm64
That’s not a safe place to get isos
From a security perspective, as long as you check the hash against Microsoft’s website then it should be okay. Otherwise I’m not sure where to get Windows on ARM ISO’s from.
That’s my point. Microsoft doesn’t seem to want you to outside of the surface
I mean yeah you’re not wrong. If only the Surface wasn’t so absurdly overpriced for what you get.