• @Kentronix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    You seem to be under the impression that I think it is moving in the direction I’d like it to. I do not think that. I said that if it were offered to have a paid service I would prefer it.

    Looking at calculated stats from 2016 which admittedly are out of date showed an ARPU of $6.70 a quarter. Assuming that has gone up by 10x and it’s $70 per quarter I think a paid service is well within the realm of possibility.

    As someone who no doubt is in the minority of users, I don’t think having a paid option for those that would use it would have a big impact on the bottom line. Most people would pile onto the free service and let Google suck up all the data they want. For people like myself that don’t click on ads intentionally, they’d probably make more money off of me individually by taking my money directly.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Looking at calculated stats from 2016 which admittedly are out of date showed an ARPU of $6.70 a quarter. Assuming that has gone up by 10x and it’s $70 per quarter I think a paid service is well within the realm of possibility.

      That’s fine. But consider how the Netflix and Amazon model are following Hulu towards “ad supported” media, despite already being a paid-for service.

      I don’t think there’s a threshold at which data providers will sincerely exempt the individual from surveillance and ads. Even if its something you’re offered, all you’re purchasing is deception. You’ll still get your data siphoned surreptitiously. And you’ll still get promos and teasers and native ads that the streaming service gets paid to show you.