• @MrGeekman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2241 year ago

      They didn’t switch to USB-C out of the goodness of their hearts. They switched because the EU passed a new law that requires that new smartphones have USB-C ports.

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 year ago

        Apple will never do anything for any other reasons besides: regulation and profit. They try and foster this image of humanitarianism and ethics, but meanwhile they build everything in sweatshops and make their own “standards” so that their loyal customers can only use the functions they need by purchasing additional dongles.

        I’m happy that they were forced into an actual standard, but I’ve already heard at least two apple users IRL claiming that USB-C is inferior for [insert random reasoning here]. Apple has cultivated the idea that they are above standards for a long time and it will take a long time to break.

          • @mriormro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            191 year ago

            Apple is a corporation with a market cap that rivals the GDP of France and a net income that rivals the GDP of Qatar. That much capital consolidated within a singular private entity doesn’t just make them any other company. Their profit seeking is wildly, wildly different than a vast majority of any other company today.

            • @Pratai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Get your head out of your ass. ALL companies will never do anything for any other reason besides profit. The size of said company doesn’t matter. A small company will fuck over its customers just as quickly if you let them.

              • Franklin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This is just the “both sides of the same” argument with different dressing.

                It’s as false here as it is there. So you’re going to tell me a company like fairphone is as unethical as Apple or Samsung?

                Yes of course they work with two completely different yields but that’s really the point The only way you can get to that yield is to be unethical so choose smaller brands choose ones that make decisions you agree with and help them grow.

                There is no completely ethical capitalism but there definitely are choices that get us somewhere better.

                • @June@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -21 year ago

                  So you’re going to tell me a company like fairphone is as unethical as Apple or Samsung?

                  Absolutely. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism and even fair phone is profit driven. Even NPOs are profit driven. No one works for a loss in western society. No one. So literally every company will do everything it does for the sake of profitability. Even fairphone.

                  You have to realize that fairphone’s whole model is a marketing gimmick. Does it happen to align with some good values? Sure, but it’s still a gimmick to separate you from your money at the end of the day.

                  • Franklin
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    This is just false. Fairphone had audits that prove it’s an improvement in both sustainability and worker conditions.

                    Of course consumerism always negatively impacts the environment but to make it all equivalent is to forsake all nuance. It’s not at all to the same magnitude.

                    I don’t believe capitalism is the answer to the world’s problems but to not celebrate a positive initiative is throwing the baby out with bath water.

              • @mriormro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                The size, profits, and overall global reach of a company heavily impacts how that company further impacts the world. Do you honestly think that, I don’t know, American Girl dolls have had the same negative impact on the world as the East India Company?

        • @M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Apple fanboys are the most frustrating people to talk to.

          They find any illogical reason to justify what apple does.

        • @Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The only reason they pass on an image of ethical environmentaly friendly company is because its good for business. People like that shit the products are good people buy. Its that simple. Companies give no shit about people or the planet.

        • @MrGeekman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I know. That’s my point. A great example of this is when they used to brag about how eco-friendly their product were. I remember them bragging about their displays being mercury-free, BFR free, etc and their laptops having totally recyclable aluminum and glass enclosures - only to later deliberately make their laptops nearly impossible to repair and upgrade.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        And they actively fought against it for as long as they could, tooth and nail.

            • @June@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              This is hilarious because there’s a comment just above yours that’s exactly the same, just turned on its head.

              I said it to the android guy and I’m gonna say it to you: pot, meet kettle.

                • @June@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Lmao, I’m an apple user, all in on the ecosystem from phone to smarthome.

                  Good try though.

        • @ink@r.nf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I see the exact opposite, and you being triggered when no one even mentioned anything you’re so offended about, proves the point.

          It’s totally not your insecurity talking, at all… but do go on…

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 year ago

          Lol what made you conclude that OP uses Android?

            • El Barto
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -91 year ago

              Then why gratuitously bash android for some weird user-related reason?

              • @who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                121 year ago

                Im not bashing android i have to use one of their devices for work; it’s ok. The users on social media with the vitriol for apple and their need to defend android is really cringe.

                • El Barto
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  I hear ya. To be honest, I don’t really engage in such types of discussions - in terms of phones, gaming, browsers, hell, even movies!

                  Those kind of vitriolic discussions are led by a minority group who has nothing else to do in life but post stupid comments on the internet.

                  I could say the same about apple users. But then I go to the real world and notice that the vast majority of people couldn’t care less about such dick- (or pussy-) measuring shenanigans.

                • @ink@r.nf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Someone who barges in a discussion getting triggered when someone said something bad about his beloved company, says he’s not. lmao

      • @MBM
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        * In terms of profit, after the Saudi Arabian Oil Group. Huh, I had no idea.

      • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Of all of the things that I vastly prefer since moving to Lemmy from reddit, anything related to Apple is not one of them. I’m actually surprised because talking about anything Apple on reddit was always a circlejerk pitchfork parade, but Lemmy still seems to outdo. The “trying to stay relevant comment” is honestly hilarious. Sure, the richest company with more than 50% of the smartphone market, that basically feeds design to the rest of the industry is trying to stay relevant.

        And another thing worth addressing, It’s probably 50/50 whether the EU is forcing them to USB-C, or just providing cover for them to move to USB-C. Modern Apple (after 1997) rarely has used proprietary standards for cables/connectors, and when they have it’s pretty obviously because there isn’t a better option, or more likely, there isn’t an option that is suited to their purpose*. Apple is/was largely the reason we’re even talking about USB, being one of the first to really adopt it. Then the dock connector for iPods, which is probably the most major example of them using a proprietary connector. If you read that link (just wiki) you’ll see that the dock connector did things that no other standard connector did at the time, and it did it in a form factor that would work with iPods. Fast forward 10 years and Apple eats shit in the press for changing to Lightning, which pre-dated USB-C and has obvious advantages over one of the worst computer connectors in modern history - micro-USB**. Apple contributed significantly to the USB-C spec, which includes many of the advantages that Lightning had first, built off of the work they did with Intel in creating another standard, Thunderbolt.

        And then on to today, where Apple is “forced” to use USB-C. Again, in 2016, Apple moved all of their high end laptops to exclusively USB-C, for which they would again be pilloried. People are still pissed those laptops dropped USB-A and MagSafe in favor of trying to drive adoption of USB-C and a one-connector-rules-them-all world. They also moved their Pro iPads over to C in 2018. Basically, Apple started moving its high-end, less price conscious customers to C long before legislation was a gleam in anyone’s eye. Their cheaper products (base model iPads) and mass-consumer products (iPhones) they moved much slower on, and even then there were a slate of “Apple keeps changing connectors all of the time!” (twice in 20 years) outrage-bait articles.

        Yes, Apple was “forced” to use the connector they created the first design references for (Lightning/Thunderbolt, and to a lesser extend Mini-DisplayPort) and then helped design, then moved to before most, in a bid to stay “relevant” in a field they already dominate.

        * Also worth noting that Apple was a main driver of adoption of USB-A, and took heat when they converted iMacs to it over PS/2, far before most PC vendors did.

        ** This alone, the amount of negative press they garnered, meant that there was likely no way Apple was going to move iPhones off of Lightning for 10 years.

      • @nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Strangely, it kinda was. They helped invent the original specification. Just not so sure they wanted to put it on iphone yet (or ever)