@produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 1 year agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square534fedilinkarrow-up12.14Karrow-down176
arrow-up12.06Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.de@produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square534fedilink
minus-square@const_void@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish36•1 year agoThe tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.
minus-squareLurker123 [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish26•1 year agoGod the insanity of that wealth is hard to fathom. Nobody needs $100m, which is itself a totally insignificant amount compared to $1b… and we’re talking people with hundreds of billions :/
minus-square@serpentofnumbers@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agofor real. $400m is closer to $0 than it is to $1b
minus-squareDialectdezenuts [none/use name]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoOwning over $100 million is a glitch and they should be permabanned from life for cheating. Or we could implement Pac-Man mechanics and if you get that rich you wrap around and start again as a villager in some food-insecure war zone.
minus-square@herpington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoHow do you handle a CEO owning stock worth that amount in the marketplace, then?
minus-square@Smk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThey don’t. No one can explain how a wealth tax work because it doesn’t work.
minus-square@herpington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoMy issue wasn’t with a wealth tax (even though I’m against it), but pulling some arbitrary wealth cap out of thin air opens a lot of questions that many people don’t consider the implications of.
The tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.
No one needs $1 billion
God the insanity of that wealth is hard to fathom.
Nobody needs $100m, which is itself a totally insignificant amount compared to $1b… and we’re talking people with hundreds of billions :/
for real. $400m is closer to $0 than it is to $1b
Owning over $100 million is a glitch and they should be permabanned from life for cheating.
Or we could implement Pac-Man mechanics and if you get that rich you wrap around and start again as a villager in some food-insecure war zone.
How do you handle a CEO owning stock worth that amount in the marketplace, then?
They don’t. No one can explain how a wealth tax work because it doesn’t work.
My issue wasn’t with a wealth tax (even though I’m against it), but pulling some arbitrary wealth cap out of thin air opens a lot of questions that many people don’t consider the implications of.
Removed by mod