• NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Capitaliam is an abstract concept, an umbrella term used to encapsulate a somewhat loose grouping of economic behaviors and theories. Humans might use capitalist ideas to justify greedy or violent actions, but they don’t “use capitalism to be greedy and violent”.

    The distinction matters because my point is that capitalism is not the source or instrument of violence, but rather a description of and rationalization for human behavior. The violence happens whether or not you conflate the behaviors of the people committing violence with capitalism.

    Ultimately I think it would be more accurate to conclude capitalism because violence and greed, not violence and greed because capitalism.

    • @folkrav@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Capitalism is not an abstract concept at all: private ownership of the means of production. Sure, there are many economic theories to go on from there, but how does it change anything to the criticism of this very core idea?

      • fkn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Without additional qualifications on the term capitalism, that is a terrible definition of capitalism.

        • @folkrav@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Feel free to come up with a better definition. It’s the one you’ll find in most dictionaries and textbooks. Of course there are more elements to it depending on the exact philosophy (more or less free market et al), but in the end, it all boils down to exactly that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      capitalism is, in fact, the instrument. the extraction of wealth from the labor of the preparation is violence