Ghostalmedia to Apple@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoApple asks US Supreme Court to strike down Epic Games orderwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down12cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkApple asks US Supreme Court to strike down Epic Games orderwww.reuters.comGhostalmedia to Apple@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square43fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareZoolanderlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-29 months ago If sideloading were legal, it would definitely solve the issue It wouldn’t solve anything. It would allow for one thing while simultaneously introducing a host of entirely different problems. Also, sideloading is already legal and Apple allows it. It’s how things like AltStore exist.
minus-square@KirbySSM@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoAltStore - 3 app limit (AltStore counts as an app), every app needs to be resigned once every week Requirement to bypass: $100/year (dev account)
minus-squareZoolanderlinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoThe majority of users do not and would not use sideloading so, although cumbersome, the limit is perfectly acceptable in 99.9% of cases.
It wouldn’t solve anything. It would allow for one thing while simultaneously introducing a host of entirely different problems.
Also, sideloading is already legal and Apple allows it. It’s how things like AltStore exist.
AltStore - 3 app limit (AltStore counts as an app), every app needs to be resigned once every week Requirement to bypass: $100/year (dev account)
The majority of users do not and would not use sideloading so, although cumbersome, the limit is perfectly acceptable in 99.9% of cases.