• @liquidparasyte@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    It’s a bit tiring that every single infringement on people’s rights to exist has to be combatted via 1A because the only thing that trumps dAsTaRdLy BeHaViOr In FrOnT oF cHiLdReN is free speech.

    Is that literally the only framework US law sees? Can’t it be illegal for lawmakers to force their views on people because they’re hateful bigots?

    • Flat Pluto Society
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Can’t it be illegal for lawmakers to force their views on people because they’re hateful bigots?

      Of course not, because that would violate their 1A rights to be hateful bigots.

    • @nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Bigoted speech is itself free speech. It’s fundamentally important that the law doesn’t make subjective judgement calls like this on what views are good or bad precisely because it protects the minority.