The Indian-origin Home Secretary has previously made clear that she will do “whatever it takes” to send asylum seekers to Rwanda – a plan that has been blocked by the courts. Her trip and speech in the US to discuss migration issues will be seen as further evidence in the Tory party that she is positioning herself as a potential leadership candidate for the right should the Conservatives lose the next election.
Did you add in “Indian Origin” cause it’s not in the article.
Why?
I’m wondering if Ms. Braverman is aware that according to her own proposed rules her parents probably should have never immigrated to the UK, and she is arguing that international treaties on migration are unfit for purpose in an “age of jet travel” while droves of migrants, including minors, trying to cross the channel in small boats.
Rules for thee, not for me
The age-old standard of conservative politics