@trk111@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoHonestly a fan of "corrosive"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1861arrow-down16
arrow-up1855arrow-down1imageHonestly a fan of "corrosive"lemmy.world@trk111@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-square@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoThere are multiple types of crises, but every existential crisis is an existential crisis. The plurality is negated by the modifier, “existential.”
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink0•1 year agoNot really. A midlife crisis and a psychotic episode could both be called existential crises. I don’t think there’s a hard definition to it like you seem to be asserting.
minus-square@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoI can already tell that if I continue this conversation, you’ll be the one in the picture.
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•1 year agoMeaning you’re going to refuse to learn about faulty parallelism?
minus-square@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoMeaning you’re getting blocked for your own good.
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•1 year agoFunny, despite your clever picture, I don’t seem to be the one suffering in this exchange.
There are multiple types of crises, but every existential crisis is an existential crisis. The plurality is negated by the modifier, “existential.”
Not really. A midlife crisis and a psychotic episode could both be called existential crises. I don’t think there’s a hard definition to it like you seem to be asserting.
I can already tell that if I continue this conversation, you’ll be the one in the picture.
Meaning you’re going to refuse to learn about faulty parallelism?
Meaning you’re getting blocked for your own good.
Funny, despite your clever picture, I don’t seem to be the one suffering in this exchange.