@trk111@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 10 months agoHonestly a fan of "corrosive"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1861arrow-down16
arrow-up1855arrow-down1imageHonestly a fan of "corrosive"lemmy.world@trk111@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 10 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-square@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•10 months agoThere are multiple types of crises, but every existential crisis is an existential crisis. The plurality is negated by the modifier, “existential.”
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink0•10 months agoNot really. A midlife crisis and a psychotic episode could both be called existential crises. I don’t think there’s a hard definition to it like you seem to be asserting.
minus-square@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•10 months agoI can already tell that if I continue this conversation, you’ll be the one in the picture.
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•10 months agoMeaning you’re going to refuse to learn about faulty parallelism?
minus-square@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•10 months agoMeaning you’re getting blocked for your own good.
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•10 months agoFunny, despite your clever picture, I don’t seem to be the one suffering in this exchange.
There are multiple types of crises, but every existential crisis is an existential crisis. The plurality is negated by the modifier, “existential.”
Not really. A midlife crisis and a psychotic episode could both be called existential crises. I don’t think there’s a hard definition to it like you seem to be asserting.
I can already tell that if I continue this conversation, you’ll be the one in the picture.
Meaning you’re going to refuse to learn about faulty parallelism?
Meaning you’re getting blocked for your own good.
Funny, despite your clever picture, I don’t seem to be the one suffering in this exchange.