• @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    Or we could just touch guns instead of pretending we only need to completely fix every aspect of our society instead.

    • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      450+ million firearms. When they effectively banned firearms in Australia…60% was the turn in rate. You know how many millions will be left? Which the majority will stay in the crimals hands? And that’s if 60% handed them in. It’s not happening

      • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        270 million fewer firearms sounds great. Australia’s 60% turn in rate wasn’t 100% and it worked, and having fewer firearms in circulation means fewer firearm deaths and fewer firearms available to criminals and a continual reduction over time as new firearms aren’t added to the system.

        Gun nuts just throw shit at the wall to see what sticks. Sometimes it’s that all those guns aren’t a problem, sometimes it’s that it’s too big a problem. You’re just tedious.

        • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Australia had around 1mil firearms in civ hands, they also didn’t have anywhere near the level of violence we do. Those 270mil firearms will come from mainly people who collect them. It won’t magically make the other 180mil safer. Most criminals get their firearms from straw purchases, not theft.

          • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Australia had around 1mil firearms in civ hands, they also didn’t have anywhere near the level of violence we do.

            It’s almost like they impact each other.

            Those 270mil firearms will come from mainly people who collect them.

            Great. Find a new goddamned hobby that doesn’t end up distributing guns into communities through theft and careless transfers. Not to mention when one of those “collectors” just decides it’s time to start killing people like the Las Vegas shooter.

            Most criminals get their firearms from straw purchases, not theft.

            Buyback should be paired with greatly restricted purchasing. Fewer and harder purchases with more tracking means fewer straw purchases and over time fewer guns. Machine guns are hard and expensive to get in part because you’re not allowed to make or sell new ones.

            Or, if you contend it’s really just straw purchases that are the problem (and want to ignore the legally purchased guns used in crimes all the time), then lets lock that down. Register every gun, require background checks for every sale, and hold the last known owner liable if it’s used in a crime and wasn’t reported stolen.

        • @Armen12@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Yeah, now Australia is having their human rights stripped away at an alarming rate. What a victory for liberty!

    • Jeremy [Iowa]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I wish you the best of luck in addressing that symptom in a society where such bans aren’t commonly-supported, where the law isn’t conducive to such, where there’s such an incredible established base of ownership, and where “fuck the government and/or police” is the prevailing theme.

      By all means, when you’ve discovered some way of meaningfully and feaaibly surmounting these, share with the class. You’ll be the first to have done so.

      Meanwhile, the rest of us will focus on the root issues - the pressures toward violence - rather than only caring someone decided to use a rifle to when finally pushed to the brink.