President Biden on Friday will announce the creation of a new office for gun violence prevention, an escalation of the administration’s efforts to tackle the issue amid stalled progress in Congress, according to four people briefed on the action who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss plans that were not yet public.

Biden and Vice President Harris are scheduled to announce the new office at an event in the White House Rose Garden on Friday afternoon, the people said.

Greg Jackson, a gun violence survivor who is the executive director of the Community Justice Action Fund, and Rob Wilcox, the senior director for federal government affairs at Everytown for Gun Safety, are expected to have key roles in the office, the people said.

  • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I highly encourage everyone to get themselves into the firearm community and change it from within. Great community. Lots of great people and its learning a new thing. But there’s lots of idiots and if you want better gun control you need to at least be familiar with the thing you’re talking about.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      and if you want better gun control you need to at least be familiar with the thing you’re talking about.

      I want universal healthcare. Should I go to medical school?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I can be familiar with guns without owning one. What necessary thing do I need to learn about guns that I can’t just read about before I can have an opinion on gun violence and regulation?

          • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You only learn so much by reading. Its why every education system has theory and practical. You learn handling, culture, nuances you wouldn’t know otherwise. But you also gain credibility. You would also gain power. The power in that if you are a client you gain some attention in the eyes of the companies and groups who sell these products. Like a shareholder, your opinion gains more weight. That weight can be used to tip the culture towards what you believe it should be if you find others with similar weight and views.

          • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Pass your P/1, then FM/2, then pass the ATPA, after pass the SRM, then the FAM, then ASTAM or ALTAM, don’t forget the PA Plus 3 fellowship exams then you can voice your opinion. Or reread what I wrote because it wasn’t saying you need all that to have an opinion

    • TheCrispyDud
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Honestly a tall order. From the debate below it seems you are of the opinion that one’s argument has no validity unless you’re one of “us”. Fine I get it, but as for the established community maybe they need to self govern a bit since there is quite the chunk that practically fetishize firearms.

      I used to be quite into the community but was nearly shouted out whenever I brought up responsible gun control and education. So yea maybe the community needs to do a better job of shaking out the crazy before asking those who don’t understand or fear firearms to come join.

      • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My opinion isn’t that unless you’re one of us your opinion isn’t valid. But it is the opinion of many people. Can a straight guy give their opinion or create laws about LGQTB culture in a country and have it be valid. Sure. But isn’t their more weight, insight and intelligent choices when it comes from within the community? I bring that up because in my area I’m seeing parents trying to create rules in the education school that outright ban the topic. Guess where its coming from.

        You and myself and others are shouted out because that sub culture hasn’t grown but its there. Many gun owners are responsible. Many hate irresponsible ones because it brings heat on them but also because it is dangerous and nobody wants idiots around them in possession of dangerous things. But the culture had been insulated and become an echo chamber. Change will only come from within.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        The issue is that if you don’t understand firearms, you really can’t write effective legislation for them. You need to have some knowledge on the subject in order to know what needs to be done to prevent the issues they cause. It’s not that you need to be in the community, it’s just that you need knowledge. If you lack that knowledge you’ll just look stupid when you discuss it with people who do have it, and they’ll not listen.

        • TheCrispyDud
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yea I’m pretty sure most people have a decent knowledge of what a gun is and what it does. The problem is the level of knowledge is never enough for the vocal group of gun enthusiasts that treat the firearm as their new deity. I don’t need to learn field strip every model of Eastern European rifle to say hey maybe we should do something about letting every Tom, Dick, and Harry have access to a death tube the same day they ask for one after they rant about minorities.

          My apologies to Tom and Harry, Dick you are on your own though.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I agree with general restrictions it’s enough, but frequently when people are trying to restrict pieces of hardware things can get pretty dumb. You need knowledge to do that.

            • TheCrispyDud
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              That’s fair, at that point though you can bring in specialists though to assist and inform.