• @Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -21 year ago

    The intent of the people behind the law isn’t what I’m discussing. It is that this should never have been on the agenda, argue for inclusion and equal right but don’t argue to change a legal document that merely recorded the facts as they were at the time.

      • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        I dont disagree with with their intention but it’s not what I’m arguing against. I’m merely saying that the document should not be altered after the fact, it should remain as it was then forever more as an official recording of the facts as they were then. That’s all. Don’t change names, genders, parents, or location. Leave it as it was unless there was a legitimate factual error like misspelling a name or address.

        The trump ban is something unrelated that I’m not discussing.

          • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            Both of those are false assertions, I’m sorry I don’t fit into the box you’d like. Not everyone who doesn’t subscribe to every facet of social issue as you is a trump supporter.

            I don’t disagree that it is their intention.

            I’m not discussing their intention, which is why the parallel doesn’t work.