During Tuesday’s hearing, José de Jesús Zalce Benítez, a forensic expert and a military doctor, walked the Congress through scans of the alleged alien bodies.
A former Navy fighter pilot, Graves was one of three U.S. veterans who testified in front of a U.S. congressional subcommittee investigating the existence of UFOs in July.
Mexico’s Congress also was shown videos of Mexican pilots struggling to make sense of fast-moving flying objects before them.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, he said he accepted the Mexican Congress’ invitation “hoping to keep up the momentum of government interest in pilot experiences” with “unidentified anomalous phenomena” or UAP.
"My testimony centered on sharing my experience and the UAP reports I hear from commercial and military aircrew through ASA’s witness program.
I will continue to raise awareness of UAP as an urgent matter of aerospace safety, national security, and science, but I am deeply disappointed by this unsubstantiated stunt."
The original article contains 375 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 59%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
During Tuesday’s hearing, José de Jesús Zalce Benítez, a forensic expert and a military doctor, walked the Congress through scans of the alleged alien bodies.
A former Navy fighter pilot, Graves was one of three U.S. veterans who testified in front of a U.S. congressional subcommittee investigating the existence of UFOs in July.
Mexico’s Congress also was shown videos of Mexican pilots struggling to make sense of fast-moving flying objects before them.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, he said he accepted the Mexican Congress’ invitation “hoping to keep up the momentum of government interest in pilot experiences” with “unidentified anomalous phenomena” or UAP.
"My testimony centered on sharing my experience and the UAP reports I hear from commercial and military aircrew through ASA’s witness program.
I will continue to raise awareness of UAP as an urgent matter of aerospace safety, national security, and science, but I am deeply disappointed by this unsubstantiated stunt."
The original article contains 375 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 59%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!