@RehRomano@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.ca • 1 year agoOpinion: It’s not that we have too many people. It’s that we have too few houseswww.theglobeandmail.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down110
arrow-up1119arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: It’s not that we have too many people. It’s that we have too few houseswww.theglobeandmail.com@RehRomano@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.ca • 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-square@givesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoYou’re working under assumption most homes have people.living in them…
minus-square@RehRomano@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilink4•1 year agoThat is a 100% indisputably correct assumption. Vacancy taxes worked where they’ve been implemented to incentivize the occupancy of empty homes and the overwhelming majority of homes have people living in them.
You’re working under assumption most homes have people.living in them…
That is a 100% indisputably correct assumption. Vacancy taxes worked where they’ve been implemented to incentivize the occupancy of empty homes and the overwhelming majority of homes have people living in them.