But since day one, there were questions about how (and if) it would pay the photographers and illustrators whose content it used to train Firefly.
They, after all, stand to lose quite a bit of business if Adobe’s users opt to simply use Firefly to generate unique images instead of downloading existing stock photos.
As the company announced today, all eligible Adobe Stock contributors with photos, vectors or illustrations in the standard and premium Stock collections will receive a bonus, which it plans to pay out annually going forward.
As Alexandru Costin, Adobe’s VP for Generative AI and Sensei, explained, the company is using a pretty straightforward formula to do so.
A spokesperson noted that the actual bonus depends strongly on the individual contributor, the volume of content they have in Stock and how it’s being used, making it difficult to provide an average.
Adobe did promise to provide more info about the overall size of the pool once it has more details to share, though.
The original article contains 355 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 53%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
But since day one, there were questions about how (and if) it would pay the photographers and illustrators whose content it used to train Firefly.
They, after all, stand to lose quite a bit of business if Adobe’s users opt to simply use Firefly to generate unique images instead of downloading existing stock photos.
As the company announced today, all eligible Adobe Stock contributors with photos, vectors or illustrations in the standard and premium Stock collections will receive a bonus, which it plans to pay out annually going forward.
As Alexandru Costin, Adobe’s VP for Generative AI and Sensei, explained, the company is using a pretty straightforward formula to do so.
A spokesperson noted that the actual bonus depends strongly on the individual contributor, the volume of content they have in Stock and how it’s being used, making it difficult to provide an average.
Adobe did promise to provide more info about the overall size of the pool once it has more details to share, though.
The original article contains 355 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 53%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!