• Rufus Q. Bodine III
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1521 year ago

    We had a good run. Good luck to the next species to dominate the earth. May you avoid religious dogma, find an economic system that respects your natural environment, and a political system that respects the right to live a clean and healthy world.

      • theodewere
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        we probably taste like shit… they sit around the campfire and remember the good old days of fresh, free range Dino blood as far as the proboscis could poke… not this Walmart meat they get now…

      • @Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Depends on how you quantify it. We sure did make a lot of money, or at least the winners did.

      • @kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        I mean, we left the planet. We created art. We did some good, and life will diversify again after we’re gone.

        • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          and life will diversify again after we’re gone.

          Here’s hoping; but that’s far from a safe assumption. The kicker about the changes we’re making to this planet is that a lot of them are positive feedback loops, so even if 100% of humans just got thanos-snapped out of existence RIGHT NOW, meaning a complete stop on fossil fuel consumption, deforestation, etc; the damage we’ve already caused will continue to get worse on its own with no further input from us.

          So how far can those feedback loops go until they’re broken naturally? They might stabilize; they might just carry on until this planet is molten.

          There will for sure be life after the last human dies, but given a few thousand more years, even the most resilient of critters could still be fucked because of us.

          • @evranch@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            they might just carry on until this planet is molten

            The odds of true runaway warming are very low, the planet has both been much hotter and had much higher CO2 levels in the past. The Holocene is actually a cool period, geologically.

            We’re just going to make it too hot to grow enough crops to feed the world.

              • @kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                The lake Toba Eruption caused a 4°C drop in global temperatures, covered asia in inches to feet of ash, and may have taken the climate 1000s of years to recover.

                Even more extreme, the lava floods that created the Siberian Traps 250 million years ago raised ocean temps to 40°C, killed off 90% of all life, and might have taken millions of years to recover.

                We are tiny. The climate and the Earth are formidable. Sure, we might have the capacity to destroy all multicellular life on earth, but she’s recovered from even worse.

                We shouldn’t ever give up, but I think the earth is capable of handling even our worst fuck-ups.

          • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            it seems pretty likely that microprocessors will survive us, and give a BIG jump start to any species that follows. literacy seems to be a longer shot, but still a possible stepping stone for some other organism to take over our work. my money is on fungi to figure out microprocessors. if not them, then plants, especially “weeds”. finally, ocean mammals might be able to work some of the junk we’ve made and cargo-cult themselves into the information age.

            i really am hopeful for life on earth to survive the death of Sol.

        • @jcit878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          we did just waste a good few million years of evolution though (let’s say 65 million accounting for the rise of mammals). earth isn’t going to be habitable forever, from memory there’s less than a billion years left before the temp would increase with the expanding sun enough to make liquid water impossible. feels like we kind of shot earth in the foot a bit here

          • @abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            65 million years isn’t that bad on a geologic scale

            As long as there isn’t a runaway greenhouse effect that turns Earth to Venus, life would almost certainly continue, with or without us.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        There were a couple of hundred thousand years of humans managing not to fuck up the entire planet, before the two centuries of doing so for the sake of money.

        • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          There were periods in which we were nicer to the planet, but we’ve always been pretty horrible to each other. Even at the stage of civilization we’re at now - with all the advancements and comforts etc - we’re still going to war with each other just for the hell of it; murdering each other over shit like skin color or what we find sexually attractive; not only profiteering off the suffering of others, but actively manufacturing suffering to profiteer off.

          We really are horrible.

          • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            We also managed to kill off almost all the large animals thousands of years ago, come to think of it.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      Realistically, extinction would be sweet relief compared to what is actually in store for humans with climate change. More likely that we hang around in smaller communities and death / suffering is even more widespread.

      • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        I mean realistically it’s all going to hell sooner or later. You’ll start with millions of climate refugees, closed borders, violence. Then climate wars (a wall with machine guns isn’t going to stop people who have no other way to survive). And if a country with nukes (like India) finds itself uninhabitable then things are really going south. Next up you have a possible nuclear war and the end of humanity as we know it.

        Sure, a small amount of humans might survive, but civilization will go down in chaos. Even areas that are inhabitable and have plenty of water will break down, because the local infrastructure can’t support hundreds of thousands of refugees forcing their way in.

          • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Oh, I was more thinking per area. Not all refugees will go to the same place.

            It will start with millions and that might already be enough to cause collapse. When it’s over a billion it’s already over.

            • Hyperreality
              link
              fedilink
              12
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The whole Syria thing already caused us lots of issues in Europe. Arguably the civil war was caused in part by climate change exacerbating a drought. The surge in refugees helped the far right and populists across Europe and was a factor in brexit.

              I can only imagine what’ll happen if it gets worse. Children of Men is likely to be eerily prophetic.

          • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve seen estimates that say a billion dead by 2100 is the most optimistic possible outcome. Even the notoriously cautious IPCC is making the most unimaginably dire predictions:

            In its report focusing on the impacts of global warming on people and the planet, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says that every inhabited continent is already experiencing multiple climate impacts, from droughts and flooding to biodiversity loss and falling food production. Between 3.3 to 3.6 billion people live in areas “highly vulnerable to climate change,” the authors warn, with “additional severe risks” should the Earth warm beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit). (From an article in Forbes magazine.)

    • @Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I wonder if primates are incapable of building a global economic system that doesn’t end in disaster