Not that it’s bad. For me, it’s actually very useful, I just find it mildly amusing that an app for managing AppImages is packaged as a Flatpak, despite the two formats being widely known as competitors*.

* Okay, most people (including me) would say that the two formats are for different use cases and aren’t directly competitors, but for the eyes of a lot of AppImage purists and Flatpak critics, they are.

    • Rikudou_SageA
      link
      261 year ago

      Tool for managing AppImages is distributed only as a flatpak.

      • @Mane25@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        I mean they are two things that co-exist, it’s not like they’re in commercial competition. Flatpak itself is usually distributed as an RPM or deb.

        • 10EXP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          OP is mostly joking about the appimage utility not having an appimage itself