@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year ago[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square806fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down1219
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1image[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?lemmy.world@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square806fedilink
minus-square@TheFonz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish15•1 year agoYour premise is wrong. You need to start with total buildable area, not the boundary size. And when you evaluate for buildable area take into account critical areas such as wetlands, flood zones etc.
minus-square@moodylinkEnglish9•1 year agoAnd keep in mind where the jobs are. Nobody wants to commute 2 hours to work.
minus-square@agarorn@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoAnd you need places for other things, such really unimportant ones, as growing food for example.
![[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f6ec67a5-2636-4875-8dd4-fa5241a3083c.jpeg){kind=link}
Your premise is wrong. You need to start with total buildable area, not the boundary size. And when you evaluate for buildable area take into account critical areas such as wetlands, flood zones etc.
And keep in mind where the jobs are. Nobody wants to commute 2 hours to work.
And you need places for other things, such really unimportant ones, as growing food for example.