The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

  • i never said it had to be because of radiation. Even just in its effect as a heavy metal it seems to be much worse. Also it could be that it becomes airborn more easily than other metals such as lead, so the wreckage of tanks shot with DU are more dangerous to the people cleaning them up.

    • @mashbooq@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      Why are you so worried about speculated harms when Ukrainians are actually being raped, tortured, and murdered by russians? Your lack of humanity is showing

        • @severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How about letting Ukrainians make that cost/benefit analysis for their own country? I think they’re grown-ups, no need to patronize.

          • mycorrhiza they/them
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            it’s not the Ukrainian people who decide, it’s the Ukrainian government that decides, and America basically decides what they decide

          • @slice1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            Are you really this delusional? Sure Ukraine has their own uranium munitions that they can decide to use anytime they want… When does the public get to decide on what happens with the tax money - fund schools, build infrastructure, etc. or send radioactive ammunition to fuel a proxy war in some corrupt country?

        • @mashbooq@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Weighing costs and benefits happens with a comprehensive set of actual facts, not a hodgepodge of speculations and fearmongering that play into the fascists’ hands