If so, was it polled somewhere?

  • @winterayars@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    If they’re willing to step aside, or even support shelter becoming a human right

    I mean, they could do that now. They don’t gotta wait until the knives are at their throat–though if that does happen, i expect plenty will say whatever they think will get them off the hook.

        • @Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When you talk about social change via the killing of landlords being a good thing, and having knives to their throats, well the police already disagree with that. I took that as a given that you didn’t care. So they could do that now, they don’t gotta wait.

          But here’s the point. We have established someone might not actively pursue social change that they know to be right because it would incur some personal cost, but they wouldn’t hinder it either. I’ve got less issue with them.

          I have most issue with people who actively hinder that social change.

          • @winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I took that as a given that you didn’t care.

            Of course i care. Don’t be foolish.

            Remember this started off with talk about Mao’s policies.

              • @winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I don’t care what the police think about Mao’s politics. That doesn’t matter. I care whether the police think they can shoot me to death and get away with it freely.

                • @Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  My apologies, I was under the impressiom you were listening to what I was saying

                  But here’s the point. We have established someone might not actively pursue social change that they know to be right because it would incur some personal cost, but they wouldn’t hinder it either. I’ve got less issue with them.

                  Clearly you aren’t, and taking to you is pointless.