@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square1045fedilinkarrow-up12.21Karrow-down1132
arrow-up12.08Karrow-down1external-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.com@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square1045fedilink
minus-square@LoveSausage@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoMinimum warranty for good solar panels at 90% is 30 years , they will last 60 (no one knows exactly) albeit not as efficient.
minus-squarelewis6991linkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-21 year agoI just had some installed. Guaranteed 80% efficiency for 20 years. I heavily doubt they will last 60 years. Had energy storage installed as well. Only guaranteed 90% (~4500 cycles) for 10 years. EDIT: double checked the data sheet. They are actually 86% for 25 years with a rated 0.5% per year degradation rate.
minus-square@LoveSausage@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoQuite sure mine had 30 years at 90 % . But it was the really good mono ones. Storage is a completely different story. But hey even if they are down to 25% I would keep them and just add new ones. 0.5 would mean 30 for 60 years also…
Minimum warranty for good solar panels at 90% is 30 years , they will last 60 (no one knows exactly) albeit not as efficient.
I just had some installed.
Guaranteed 80% efficiency for 20 years.I heavily doubt they will last 60 years.Had energy storage installed as well. Only guaranteed 90% (~4500 cycles) for 10 years.
EDIT: double checked the data sheet. They are actually 86% for 25 years with a rated 0.5% per year degradation rate.
Quite sure mine had 30 years at 90 % . But it was the really good mono ones. Storage is a completely different story. But hey even if they are down to 25% I would keep them and just add new ones.
0.5 would mean 30 for 60 years also…