• HipPriest
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    I mean the article is specifically about Google search. Which might have gone downhill since whenever it first came out with the introduction of ads (sorry, ‘Sponsored Results’) but I’m not seeing significantly better competition for delivering search results. Everyone is still just aping the brand leader.

    DuckDuckGo is obviously better for privacy for example but it doesn’t seem to have any ambition except to deliver the same results as Google but without the ads and tracking which is ok but not a big enough draw except for people already concerned about privacy. Bing gets essentially the same results but if anything seems more spammy than Google with pop ups about making it or edge your default search engine or browser. It feels like other search engines just take Google search as something to copy and put their spin on it though.

    I’d say search is one of the things Google is still getting right enough to earn its place as the leader. Some things it does well, some things it has badly declined on (someone above mentioned Google assistant hardly understanding anything anymore, when it used to be the best in this area too), but generally you can replace most Google things with programmes doing things their own way. Search engines just feel a bit like reskins to me

    • ripcord
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      DuckDuckGo is obviously better for privacy for example but it doesn’t seem to have any ambition except to deliver the same results as Google but without the ads

      I don’t think duckduckgo has ANY control over improving the search results. Except maybe switching to a different engine.

      • @micka190@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Pretty much. The reason Google’s search results were so good was because of the information they had on you and on other users who made similar searches. I’m not advocating for DDG to start tracking users, though. But it’ll be hard for them to have a “Google-like” search experience (single search bar with no other parameters) without that kind of data.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          I completely disagree. Their results have started decreasing in value and accuracy the more they tie them into their profile of you. Google was most useful when it showed you what you searched for. Many of the problems with their results now stem from it showing you what it thinks you want, rather than showing you what you asked for. The rest of the problem is it showing you what is profitable, rather than what you asked for.

          • no banana
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I think it’s because their profile of “you” has gotten more narrow as it has gotten better at figuring you out. It has started making assumptions about what you want instead of recommending things others want.

            • BEEKAYRANDEE
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Agreed. And in a way, it is also a contributing factor to how polarizing internet-based discussion has become. Rather than show you the most cited websites for answering a political question, it’s going to use its profile of “you” to show you something you’re more likely to engage with.

              • no banana
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, it’s a massive issue with Google. It just doesn’t serve the content you need anymore, and rather shows what it thinks you’ll want.

                Google is great at finding products. DuckDuckGo isn’t perfect either, but it’s better at neutral information than Google.

            • SokathHisEyesOpen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I don’t want it to make assumptions, I want it to show me what I told it to show me and not show me what I specifically told it not to. They’ve been ignoring the negative operator quite a lot lately.

              • no banana
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                That’s what I’m saying. I think it’s assumptions has made it much worse.

        • pewter
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Google immediately jumped ahead in search when it started by having a simple webpage and using PageRank. This was a while before there were even Gmail accounts and all the tracking we’re given now.

          At this point I’d settle for a search company that doesn’t care to track you, uses general (not specific) predictive search, implements Boolean search, and isn’t diminished in quality by SEO.

          That last criterion is the hardest one. It might not even be feasible.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Kagi is better than all the others combined. Yes you have to pay for it. If you spend any time on the Internet day-to-day then it’s worth it.

      • @Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I just started trialling kagi the other day and I’m enjoying it so far but one thing I miss is how reliably Google can tell me opening hours when I search for a local cafe. The web results have been better so far, though.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I just use Google maps for that. It will ALWAYS show the hours if they’re listed, instead of sometimes like on Google results pages. On my phone I use the maps app and on my desktop I go to maps.google.com.

          • @Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            yes, google maps is still king fothat I guess. After a bit more searching on Kagi, though, I’m really liking it, is there a way to see how many searches you have left?

      • HipPriest
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Doesn’t seem to play nicely with Firefox Android unfortunately. Which is ironic because Chrome on Android is one of the areas of Google I decided to experiment degoogling from just a week ago or so

        • SokathHisEyesOpen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I use it on Firefox Android and it works fine. Go to settings/search/default search engines, then tap “add a search engine”. You can even use a token to enable Kagi in private browsing. Then you just select Kagi instead of one of the other options.

          • HipPriest
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Ah I was just going to their website and it was refusing to load the page. But then when I tried it on Chrome it was fine.

            I’ll have a play around later, cheers

    • @Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Kagi is pretty great. But I haven’t used Google Search in a few years, so I can’t properly judge.

      • @June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I switched full time to bing last month and have so far not missed google at all.

        I’d rather not just go to another mega corp, but the rest that I tried out just didn’t get the results I was looking for.

    • @iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Brave search uses a different index, so I like searching it first since it will give me significantly different results

    • @kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Ddg is driving me crazy with correcting what i type to give more generalized results. Searx is my new favorite. It’s not just a google reskin.