• @barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Take a page from the communists and limit yourself to critical support.

    Take a page from Antifa and not call a huge organisation Nazi because there’s a couple of Nazis in there.

    My main issue, here, from the beginning, has been you trivialising the term. You still do it, without reflection, in an attempt to win an argument on the internet. As if it was some two-sided partisan US politics or such.

    • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Take that same exact page and recognize that if there’s ten liberals at the table with a Nazi there’s eleven Nazis at the table.

      An organization that accepts Nazis is a Nazi organization.

      I’m not trivializing the fact that the ukranian state actively welcomes Nazis. I’m responding appropriately with revulsion and disdain.

      To the extent that there is any path to peace that leaves Donetsk and Luhansk in the control of the ukranian state, it does not hinge on accepting and welcoming Nazis.

      If the state is doing so, it’s not out of necessity, but alignment.

      There is no argument to be won here. Anyone reading this thread of comments will wonder why it’s so important that Nazis are accepted. I’m recommending you, as a person who ought to be familiar with the insidious nature of fascism, stop defending Nazis.

      • @barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        If the state is doing so, it’s not out of necessity, but alignment.

        So then you’re ready to call Russia a Nazi state over fielding a fuckton of fascist regiments? Have a look at Utkin’s tattoos. Everyone in Russia knew, noone higher up cared.

        • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          They’re both liberal fascist states. One was put in place by nato after they realized they couldn’t just carve it up, the other was put in place by nato to oppose the first when they denied it membership.

          Stop deflecting and trying to place me in support or opposition to the members of this absolutely avoidable conflict and most importantly: stop defending nazis.

          • @barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            One was put in place by nato after they realized they couldn’t just carve it up

            Oh my sides I dare you to say that in Russia. Bring a stopwatch so you can time how long it takes for you to arrive in a prison camp in Siberia. The FSB doesn’t suffer that kind of talk, “Russia is controlled by its enemies” (from their POV. In reality Russia has exactly one enemy: Itself).

            this absolutely avoidable

            Absolutely avoidable, true: Russia could stop being imperialist and, for a change, and harkening back to Lenin’s times, focus on developing itself. Like Ukraine did. Which is why the Siloviki in Russia can’t have that happen, it sets a bad precedent for a culturally related people to gets its shit in order, people actually getting what they want, being better off, all that kind of stuff.

            • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Okay first things first, I never said Russia was controlled by its enemies, second:

              This isn’t about my views on geopolitics, it’s about ohs you need to stop defending Nazis. Do that and we can have a wide ranging conversation about any number of topics.

              But first, stop defending Nazis!

              • @barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Okay first things first, I never said Russia was controlled by its enemies,

                Explain that to the FSB officer.

                But first, stop defending Nazis!

                I never defended Nazis, and you have yet to make an argument that doesn’t bog down to “I hate that /u/barsoap is right about symbols”. It’s you who’s trivialising the term.

                • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I’m not trivializing anything.

                  You are saying that azov battalion using the wolfsangel is not a nazi symbol.

                  It’s a defense of Nazis because you’re providing cover for the spread of their ideology. You need to stop defending Nazis.

                  • @barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    Ok you’ve got me. Now show me where Azov is spreading Nazi ideology. Post-2015. I’m waiting.