@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square1045fedilinkarrow-up12.21Karrow-down1132
arrow-up12.08Karrow-down1external-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.com@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square1045fedilink
minus-square@pedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoExcept that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.
minus-square@uis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year ago This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials. You mean under ground from where it was dug out?
minus-square@pedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThe plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.
minus-square@uis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoYou mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.
minus-square@pedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoMillion years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.
minus-square@intensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThen how does it fuel nuclear reactors?
Except that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.
You mean under ground from where it was dug out?
The plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.
You mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.
Million years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.
Then how does it fuel nuclear reactors?