• Pisodeuorrior
    link
    fedilink
    891 year ago

    Also, this seems like a much, MUCH better PR move than throwing paint at masterpieces in fucking museums.
    I don’t know who thought that was something that would have moved the public opinion towards their cause.

    • acannan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      Well it did seem to do a good job bringing attention to their cause. And, the worst damage incurred over the dozens of demonstrations was some minor frame damage. Imo it was kind of a brilliant scheme to get worldwide attention for the price of some tomato soup

    • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They were throwing paint into corporate offices and CEO’s cars at the same time. The media chose to put the art vandalism on blast. I wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out the art vandalism was the idea of a corporate mole.

        • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          No, I can believe that true believers thought that art vandalism was a good idea, but I’m just skeptical about where the idea originated from.

      • @books@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 year ago

        Not to sound like a dick, but you sort of sound like Matt Gaetz accusing Antifa of J6.

        There is zero proof that these people are moles. I’d be hard pressed to find a white 20 something to act the part of a climate activist, on the behalf of the oil companies.