§ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧ to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoJoe Biden’s DOJ is Claiming “There is No Constitutional Right to a Stable Climate”jacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down119cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldnottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up191arrow-down1external-linkJoe Biden’s DOJ is Claiming “There is No Constitutional Right to a Stable Climate”jacobin.com§ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧ to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square61fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldnottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-square@datszechuansauce@infosec.publinkfedilink1•1 year agoJustify the existence of national parks then
minus-squareAnonTwolinkfedilink1•1 year agoNot sure why you’re here 4 days later…but nothing in the constitution says they can’t have national parks. Again, the issue is just it has nothing to do with it. There’s easily other avenues to go about than the constitution.
minus-square@datszechuansauce@infosec.publinkfedilink1•1 year agoWhy are you here? And if nothing in the constitution says we can’t have national parks, nothing in it says we can’t regulate a stable climate. I don’t even really disagree with you that there are better ways to go about it. It’s just stupid to agree with their claim.
Justify the existence of national parks then
Not sure why you’re here 4 days later…but nothing in the constitution says they can’t have national parks.
Again, the issue is just it has nothing to do with it. There’s easily other avenues to go about than the constitution.
Why are you here? And if nothing in the constitution says we can’t have national parks, nothing in it says we can’t regulate a stable climate.
I don’t even really disagree with you that there are better ways to go about it. It’s just stupid to agree with their claim.