• @BucketHat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    28
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand this logic. It had to be quickly developed because the entire world population was affected by COVID. We’re talking about millions of deaths. Economies halted, everything literally went stand still and you expected the vaccine to take 3 years to develop?

    I’m sure it might have sounded scary to have medicine developed so rapidly but I don’t think you realize the scale at how it was developed because so many countries and companies dumped a ton of money researching a cure out the door as fast as possible.

    Sure there are side-effects but in that case the side effects were worth having versus the deaths of high risk individuals.

    Edit: reduced sensationalism

    • @DV8@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Sure there are side-effects but in that case the side effects were worth having versus millions of deaths

      I mean, one of the most commonly mentioned side effects was something that happened in a much more serious form with a real COVID infection. It’s the easiest way to meet antivaxxers in the middle if they’re arguing in good faith. Even if there’s a significant side effect of myocarditis, it’s not nearly as common or heavy as the myocarditis die effect of an actual infection.

      • @Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As I recall, all the side effects of the Covid vaccines are side effects present with other vaccines, and they are all auto-immune responses. You are at a much much greater risk of all of those if you actually caught Covid.

        I suppose there is a bit of calculus involved. If you are 100 times more likely to suffer from Guillain–Barré syndrome or myocarditis if you catch a disease, but the disease is exceptionally rare, it might not make sense to get a vaccine. In Covid’s case though, a substantial amount of the general population caught Covid, meaning that the overall risk was substantially reduced by being vaccinated.

        Some people just seem to have trouble with risks and percentages; shades of grey rather than black or white. Getting vaccinated isnt 100% the right call, it’s only 99.99+% the right call. Ironic that the same people were totally cool with a 0.5% of Covid killing them, never mind all the other sever side effects. You were asking them to make a choice between 99.99% fine vs. 90% fine or 99.9999+% non-lethal and 99.5% non-lethal. You look at the relative risks though and the vaccine was thousands of times more safe than catching Covid unvaccinated.

      • @GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Any sort of medical treatment has side effects. For instance I got diabetes, you know what the side effects of using Insulin is? Death. Do you know what the side effects of untreated diabetes is? Death. Do you know what the side effect of life is? Eventually death. We are all going to get there someday, but I mean might as well stretch it out as long as possible, way I see it. There’s so much I want to see, after all. Are the Leafs ever going to win the cup? Am I ever going to see retirement? Do I ever get my Corvette? This lady in the story is never going to have any of those answers, because they were too worried about side effects.

        That’s what I don’t get about these people barking about the side effects, I mean it might kill you or make you stupid, sure (I mean it’s possible, but highly unlikely). But so can falling out of bed in the morning. Or you know, COVID or whatever other disease you are trying to prevent. Was it raced out? I mean, sure. But pandemics, you know? Not a lot of time on anyones hands. And I’d say they’ve been pretty god damn effective. Like they bitch about shutting things down and the economy and mAH freedumbs, but then they bitch about racing out the vaccines, it’s like shit, what can we do to make you folks happy here?

    • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      -71 year ago

      because the entire world population was dying from COVID

      Okay I’m no anti vaxxer but this is just going to get you laughed at by the people you’re trying to convince.

      About 1% was at risk of death, and that’s no small number, and we all had to get vaccinated to protect them, and that’s fine. But outright stating the entire world population was dying is just laughable sensationalism.

      If you want to convince people, you’re never going to do it with sensationalism, especially when that sensationalism is so dramatic is flat out wrong.

      • @Wirrvogel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        It was overwhelming hospitals, which means people with other problems were dying, because ambulances were not getting to them, surgeries had to be postponed. If all your firefighters are sick, more people will die in fires and accidents. If a high number of people in a society get sick that society is breaking. No law enforcement, no health care, no working government, no grocery store.

        You are one of the people that complain when action is taken and works that that action wasn’t needed because it wasn’t that bad and when no action is taken how bad the government is. And Covid wasn’t at all the worst it could have been. There will be a next virus in the future and people like you will not have learned anything from this one and drive us into an even worse crisis, just by being stubborn.

        • @towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Best counter point is y2k.
          Huge publicity. Massive amounts of money spent.
          New year 1999/2000 was uneventful (except for parties).
          … Y2k was a hoax, waste of money… Wut?!

          It wasn’t. There’s is proof of such. It was removed/mitigated by a huge effort of developers.

          • MapleEngineerOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            “We spent millions of dollars and a year preparing and NOTHING HAPPENED! All that time and money wasted!”

        • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          You are one of the people that complain when action is taken and works that that action wasn’t needed because it wasn’t that bad and when no action is taken how bad the government is.

          Yup, that’s basically the entirety of the whole anti-vax thing in one sentence. Vaccines have been so effective at eradicating so many diseases people don’t have a concept of have deadly diseases can be and can’t grasp why getting a vaccine is so important to protect them from disease.

        • Cam
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -131 year ago

          Stop watching the news man. None of what you said actually happened.

          • @Wirrvogel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It did not happen because most people stayed at home, were wearing a mask, followed social distancing rules, were working from home, kept their children at home, washed their hands and got the vaccine when it was available. Again, it did not happen because we stopped it from happening and now you go “it wasn’t that bad” ignoring the billions of people who stopped it from getting that bad.

            It’s like “seatbelts are against my freedom” and when everyone wears one to go “look people don’t die in car crashs that proofs seatbelts are unnecessary and only made up by the news” when the reason for them not dying is that they wear a seatbelt.

            • Cam
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -51 year ago

              The vaccine, a mysterious injection that was forced on the population, created by big pharma who has a repuation for dishonesty for decades. Comparing this to seatbelts is a horrible comparision. Seatbelts BTW are straps you wear to ensure you do not go flying out the wind shield during a car crash. No mystery around that, no closed source injection being pumped into your bloodstream when wearing a seat belt.

              And COVID mass deaths would of not happen if life was allowed to go on as normal. There were places like South Dakota that did nothing authoritative and I do know South Dakota still exists, life goes on.

              Again, stop watching the news. Unplug from the matrix and then you will see the source code to all of this madness.

    • @nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -501 year ago

      Economies halted because the public freaked out. The vast, vast majority of healthy people were absolutely fine. Most of those who died, with respect, had relatively few years of life left anyway.

      Society should strive to keep these vulnerable people as safe as possible. But I personally think it was incredibly unethical to shut down whole economies just for that.

      • nicktron
        link
        fedilink
        341 year ago

        Still waiting for you to cite the risks that outweigh the benefits, now that too much time has passed for you to still thing of it as “rushed”.

              • @yata@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                23
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They already did, that was done before they launched the vaccines. You still don’t think they are safe, so now it is up to you to prove why. Which you can’t, because you have nothing but your feelings to show for it.

                • @nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -231 year ago

                  They did but it was an abridged version shall we say. Which is fine. It was an emergency and the law foresees this.

                  But the cultural shift towards harm avoidance at all costs and general authoritarianism (as clearly on display here on this site) led governments the world over to, use heavy handed tactics, shall we say, to get people to take it.

                  I am absolutely not against the vaccines. I got three doses of Pfizer. But I am profoundly against the heavy handed tactics used in deploying them.

                  • MapleEngineerOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    41 year ago

                    They completed all of the normal testing. The mRNA vaccines technology is decades old. They did all of the normal testing but the stages were done in parallel and pushed ahead of everything else in the pipe. Had any stage failed the approvals would not have been given. This is an anti-vax meme but it is completely false.

                  • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    But I am profoundly against the heavy handed tactics used in deploying them.

                    Ah yes, the heavy handed tactics of checks notes zero consequences to the people who didn’t take it.

      • MapleEngineerOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 year ago

        I was in Spain at the beginning of the pandemic. The bodies they were stacking in the back of army trucks because their mortuary system had collapsed were not fine.