• sgaM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    but phone is not comparable to heroin. gaming or social media could be addicting. if sugar is addicting, do we ban shops? because shops sell sugary stuff (similar to phone providing the addictive thing)

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We actually sorta tax sugary drinks, yeah.

      When we identify something as addictive enough to be problematic, the government finds a suitable way to interrupt, slow, or even ban it, depending on what people are receptive to.

      This is normal.

      • sgaM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        so tax social media and gaming, not the shop

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Again, some countries do stuff like that. They put regulations on what addictive content games can have, like loot boxes. China has attempted to restrict how many hours citizens can play games (though there’s a lot of resistance to it).

          Social media is even trickier because it’s so vaguely defined, and doesn’t involve payment to begin with. What’s the concept - “Please pay a 5c tax to view one page of posts”? Even so, government committees have taken social media companies to task for their algorithms promoting divisive content before.