• EnderWi99in
    link
    fedilink
    40
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Constitution itself would suggest he’s already barred from running. I am just hoping someone takes this up and actually challenges it in the courts well ahead of time. Disqualification comes the moment you’re even brought to trial on sedition charges. This was incorporated language following the Civil War as there otherwise would have been too many people to disqualify individually through the litigation process ahead of future elections.

    This article does a good job explaining this provision within the 14th Amendment: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/10/us/trump-jan-6-insurrection-conservatives.html

      • Alien Nathan Edward
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        The corrupt supreme court has literally ruled that part of the text of the second amendment is the absolute unchallengable law of the land and another part just doesn’t count. They don’t just pick the cherries, they pit them as well.

    • @MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am just hoping someone takes this up and actually challenges it in the courts well ahead of time.

      I personally know someone working to file suit against the state AG to bar trump from the ballot in their state, so there are things going on. Whether they’re successful or not is anyone’s guess.

      My guess is “no, they won’t be.” The 14th may in fact bar someone from holding office, however, it’s my personal belief the 5th and the 14th both require them to be convicted of said offenses to first trigger the bar

      • @dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        The 14th may in fact bar someone from holding office, however, it’s my personal belief the 5th and the 14th both require them to be convicted of said offenses to first trigger the bar.

        When the 14th amendment was passed, it was interpreted quite broadly to mean anyone who was involved in the Confederacy, in any capacity. It had nothing to do with any conviction. And in 1872, Congress passed an “amnesty act” limiting the restrictions to politicians and military officers, implying that even grunts in the Confederate army were deemed disqualified until the act passed.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesty_Act

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          The 14th also contains the due process clause which would seem to require some form of court process before precluding anyone from participating in their right to seek office.

          Not that I like it at the moment, but it’s there