• @Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Burning fields and forests is called back burning . It’s a practice that is saving the forest. If you don’t, the burning forests gets out of hand and all is lost. Just ask Australia circa 2019 when the PM refused to do the needed.

      • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Calm down. you either clearly cannot understand the differences or refuse to understand the differences of back burning and deforestation. And until you do you should stop speaking on the subject of ‘what is good for the world’ cuz clearly you are doing it in a very bad actor/sensationalist way.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          burning fields and forests is called back burning

          Not always. Sometimes it’s deforestation. Most often throughout human history, it’s been deforestation

          You’re talking nonsense man

    • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      That’s a very different thing to clear cutting, it’s like saying dumping toxic waste in your fish pond is the same as feeding them.

      • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t responding to the clear cutting. I was responding to the burning. I don’t know what you’re on about but way to mangle a topic.

        • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          Ok let me explain in more detail, there is what you describe of back burning which exists in some places but there is also the widely practiced method of clear cutting which often involves burning down the forest to get rid of it and create farm land. Did you not see all the stories about deforestation in Brazil using this method?