If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

  • melfie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Obviously, you know the answer. Yes, I take your point about paying for something that provides value, and generally would agree if not for the corrupt political system that allows a corporation like Google to have the near complete hedgemony that YouTube enjoys. As it stands, there are basically 4 choices right now:

    1. Watch ads and let them spy on you
    2. Pay them while they still spy on you with a guaranteed real identity
    3. Use smaller platforms that have few creators contributing content, many of which are for-profit and may one day go public and turn into something resembling Google today
    4. Use ad blockers / alternative clients to have your cake and eat it too.

    Since Google also wants to have their cake and eat it too by charging you while still tracking you, and at the same time, mistreating the users and creators responsible for their success, it follows that the members of a left-leaning and tech-savvy community like Lemmy would overwhelmingly choose option 4 while also doing option 3 whenever possible.