Wi-Fi sniffers strapped to drones—Mike Lindell’s odd plan to stop election fraud | Lindell wants to fly drones near polling places to monitor voting machines.::Lindell wants to fly drones near polling places to monitor voting machines.

    • @dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not about the voting method. These people want to invalidate votes they don’t like. Arizona Republicans went on a wild goose chase of looking for bamboo fibers in printed ballots which would “prove” they were printed in China.

      • @tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        From what I know about American politics I can believe their motive is to invalidate votes they don’t like instead of actually preventing election fraud.

        My suggestion of paper voting is a tongue-in-cheek recommendation for them to prevent election fraud because it would prevent them from being the ones to do it (at scale).

    • @BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Even simpler solution: don’t take claims of voter fraud seriously when it’s the mypillow guy.

    • @rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      2020 election had 160 million votes. There were 2 cases of fraud for Trump. How about you prove the existing system is fraudulent before suggesting a change?

      • @tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        My understanding is America uses voting machines, which by their very nature is easy to attack without being tracked. How were the 2 cases of fraud detected and did they involve a voting machine?

        • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          This will vary by state but most states use paper ballots which are counted by voting machine, but the ballots themselves are kept as a backup. This is how recounts happen in very close elections, but also notable that recounts are mostly a roll of the dice to see if enough human errors stack up in the right direction to change the outcome in favor of the otherwise losing candidate

          • @tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            the ballots themselves are kept as a backup Ideally they are transported and kept under watch by many different parties with a stake in the result. Is the backup watched until it’s deemed no longer needed?

            recounts are mostly a roll of the dice to see if enough human errors stack up All the different parties should be watching out for errors, a human error should be difficult to happen when many humans wanting their party’s votes to be counted :s

            • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Ideally they are transported and kept under watch by many different parties with a stake in the result. Is the backup watched until it’s deemed no longer needed?

              My understanding based on what I remember hearing a family member who works the polls explain is that they are locked up, then transported by the manager of that poll to presumably the county clerk who then takes possession of them and again they are kept under lock and key. These paper ballots also have to match up with a separate ledger of voters and signatures from that polling place, so even if someone added or subtracted ballots in between it would be identified. They would have to replace the ballot, which I believe is also numbered so they’d have to also forge an identical ballot of the correct ballot number to replace it with.

              All the different parties should be watching out for errors, a human error should be difficult to happen

              My understanding of the process is they’ll have two teams of people repeating eachother’s work on sets of 50 ballots, verifying the ballot matches the ledger tallying the votes then check if their counts match for every batch of 50, if the two teams counts do not match they recount the batch of 50 until the two teams counts match. So miscounting and not catching it is difficult, but if you’ve got 200,000 ballots and you assume an error rate of 1/10000 that’s potentially 200 votes that might flip due to pure human error. It’s a roll of the dice for the candidate, but if you lost a key county by 75 votes then you’ve got decent odds of the recount changing the outcome of that county election

              • @tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Thanks for your explanation. A counting machine is still concerning but I’m a little less concerned now.

    • Hyggyldy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I mean there hasn’t been any at scale fraud of electronic machines. All of the Ambulatory Tupee’s claims have been shown to be false.