Lena@gregtech.eu to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-21 day agoISO 8601 ftw rulegregtech.euimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1581arrow-down125file-text
arrow-up1556arrow-down1imageISO 8601 ftw rulegregtech.euLena@gregtech.eu to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-21 day agomessage-square119fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresgalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·21 hours agoif i am not wrong, it is because essentially both are same (slight differences in what is allowed and what is not, https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601), but RFC is more free as in freedom
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 hours agoSo what’s the RFC time format?
minus-squaresgalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agobase structure is still same yyyy MM dd hh mm ss (for many examples, you can check link above) - there is a diagram showing overlap - https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601/raw/master/res/Screenshot.png but in short the rfc allows for more freedom of the symbuols used and capitalization (like dd/mm/yyyy vs dd-mm-yyyy)
if i am not wrong, it is because essentially both are same (slight differences in what is allowed and what is not, https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601), but RFC is more free as in freedom
Thx i take that back
So what’s the RFC time format?
base structure is still same yyyy MM dd hh mm ss (for many examples, you can check link above) - there is a diagram showing overlap - https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601/raw/master/res/Screenshot.png
but in short the rfc allows for more freedom of the symbuols used and capitalization (like dd/mm/yyyy vs dd-mm-yyyy)