Lena@gregtech.eu to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-23 months agoISO 8601 ftw rulegregtech.euimagemessage-square144linkfedilinkarrow-up1641arrow-down127file-textcross-posted to: iso8601@lemmy.sdf.org
arrow-up1614arrow-down1imageISO 8601 ftw rulegregtech.euLena@gregtech.eu to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square144linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: iso8601@lemmy.sdf.org
minus-squaresgalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 months agoif i am not wrong, it is because essentially both are same (slight differences in what is allowed and what is not, https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601), but RFC is more free as in freedom
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoSo what’s the RFC time format?
minus-squaresgalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agobase structure is still same yyyy MM dd hh mm ss (for many examples, you can check link above) - there is a diagram showing overlap - https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601/raw/master/res/Screenshot.png but in short the rfc allows for more freedom of the symbuols used and capitalization (like dd/mm/yyyy vs dd-mm-yyyy)
if i am not wrong, it is because essentially both are same (slight differences in what is allowed and what is not, https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601), but RFC is more free as in freedom
Thx i take that back
So what’s the RFC time format?
base structure is still same yyyy MM dd hh mm ss (for many examples, you can check link above) - there is a diagram showing overlap - https://github.com/IJMacD/rfc3339-iso8601/raw/master/res/Screenshot.png
but in short the rfc allows for more freedom of the symbuols used and capitalization (like dd/mm/yyyy vs dd-mm-yyyy)