A joint U.S.-Mexico topographical survey found that 787 feet of the 995-feet-long buoy line set up by Texas are in Mexico.

  • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -31 year ago

    The Cuban Missile Crisis, A U2 being shot down in Soviet Air Space, trash being blown into Canada, are these things equivalent to you?

    • some_guy
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re arguing for states having free reign to fuck with international entities by doing whatever they want - up to, but not including, the Cuban missile crisis?

      • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Absolutely not. I’m saying that trash on an international border isn’t an international incident unless you are trying to make mountains out of mole hills. Neither is building a fence there.

        • some_guy
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So if that’s not what you’re arguing for, where is the line when something becomes an international incident?

          It seems to me like you aren’t sure or at least aren’t capable enough to communicate your position clearly, but you have a visceral need to keep arguing because your heels are so dug in already.

          • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            I’m not trying to come up with a general legal definition of “international incident.” I am merely disagreeing with calling this specific thing an “international incident,” at least unless the person using the term explains why they chose that term, and why that term matters in this case. But for me, international incident has much more weight then a fence that was built in the neutral area between two sovereign but friendly open-border nations.

            If you still want to go down the international incident branch, I’d consider the agricultural practices of US farmers in California drawing too much water for our downstream neighbors much more appropriate.

            • some_guy
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s an international incident because it requires international intervention to solve.

              If you look up the definitions of “international” and “incident” in any dictionary it should be pretty straight-forward to understand why anyone would use that term to describe the situation at hand. But somehow you’ve decided it’s not that - but you can’t say why specifically, nor can you define what qualifies as an international incident.

              But he owes you an explanation?

              Ok 🤣

              • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                -31 year ago

                Ok. Trivially it’s an international incident as this is occurring in the border region between The US State, Texas and The free and soverign state of Tamaulipas, Mexico. So what?

                • some_guy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  You said it wasn’t a big deal because it wasn’t an international incident.

                  Honestly what the fuck are you trying to say?

                  • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -4
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No I said it wasn’t a big deal at all calling it an “international incident” changes nothing because at the end of the day it’s just a fence.