• @themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, they found out they could win, when they stuck it to X and straight up banned them until they complied.

      Just like the big tech companies have different ToS for EU consumers.

      Mad respect to them, but it should be normal. But it’s not.

      • @lolrightythen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        209 hours ago

        Also like California passing public health laws and companies deciding it is easier to comply to the entire U.S. instead of duplicating product lines.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3214 hours ago

      All the BRICS have. Brazil just stands out, because its not a country we’ve flagged as “Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages”.

      • xor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        29 minutes ago

        Oh yeah, Russia is real good at keeping those tech oligarchs in check /s

        BRICS is such a loosely linked group that generalising like that is just never going to be accurate; Indian and South African, for example, policy on tech regulation couldn’t be more different if they tried.

        Don’t get me wrong, I think BRICS is a good organisation for economic cooperation between these very diverse countries, but there’s really no common political, social or economic characteristics.

        Brazil is a good example of that, because under Bolsonaro, it couldn’t have been more different - regulations on big tech and banning X would never have happened under his tenure (well, at least not with the same goals)

      • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7814 hours ago

        It also helps that unlike the R and the C in BRICS, they aren’t imperialists threatening and/or invading their neighbours. Brazil is a good world citizen.

        • @masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 hours ago

          Brazil is a good world citizen.

          Uhhh, did you forget that Brazil was being run by a fascist war criminal just a short while ago?

          • xor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            27 minutes ago

            And now it isn’t, that’s democracy, baby

            I fully agree that Bolsonaro was a straight up demon, but I also agree with the idea that - currently - the administration of Brazil is probably about as good an example of a good world citizen as it gets

            • @yeahiknow3
              link
              English
              3612 hours ago

              Fact checking is censorship apparently.

              • @Monomate@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -147 hours ago

                The old system of using fact-checking agencies was biased, and the content they deemed false had its reach negatively impacted. They were literally the arbiters of truth, and their actions silenced their political opponents’ voices. The new system of Community Notes is superior because it requires approval from people with diverse political alignments to show a fact-check to everyone.

                • @imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  116 hours ago

                  Because remember you need a Nazi and a tankie to agree with facts in order for it to be the real truth.

                  Sometimes reality doesn’t align with political views. Doesn’t mean it’s not facts

          • @forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 hours ago

            I think you might be confused. They were talking about a country other than the US. 😂

      • @ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        because its not a country we’ve flagged as “Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages”.

        Unless the subject is Amazon deforestation, in which case we have to stop these inhuman savages from destroying this global patrimony (mine). Please don’t ask who’s buying the cattle and soy being grown there or running the mining companies or where I got all this fertile land.

        • @mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Reminds me of people who said Amazon deforestation warranted a “military intervention.” Hey, be funny if trumpet added another country to his want-to-invade list, wouldn’t it? Yet folks still feel bothered when I say people in rich countries don’t really care all that much about poorer ones.