• Blake [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    911 year ago

    Genuinely, I think it’s probably because they feel a little guilty when they see you wearing one, and that’s uncomfortable for people, so they respond by taking it out on you.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 year ago

      A while lot of liberalism and liberal brainworms involves feeling uncomfortable about someone else caring too much in a way that isn’t convenient for treat consumption.

      • @phej@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        “feeling uncomfortable about someone else” that’s what fascism is dear. Conservatives so are so uncomfortable about what people have in their pants and what they do with it that they want to ban people from talking about transgender and sexuality topics

        • duderium [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Maybe you’re new here, but fascism and liberalism are two sides of the capitalist coin. Liberals stopped masking almost the instant Biden set foot in the White House, despite the fact that 2/3 of covid deaths occurred while Biden was office (liberals will also excuse Biden’s “inaction” while claiming that Trump, who occupied the same office, was a tyrannical authoritarian totalitarian dictator who ran roughshod over the hallowed institutions of our precious democracy). Capitalism is a death cult, workers should run the world, not bourgeois scum and their running dogs.

          • @eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Biden’s been in office 2.5x as long as US covid was a thing under Trump.

            I agree Biden has decided to throw some lives in the chipper to keep REITs and employers happy, but the “twice as many deaths under Biden” stat is empty ragecalories.

          • Farman [any]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Im not sure; while fascism is certainly the logical conclusion of lieralism. And we can observe so in the protofascist regimes in early 20th century mexico and turkey. i think liberalism is paraphiletic to fascism sort of like reptiles are to birds. The material conditions that enable one over the other are distinct enough, and the core ideological asumptions seem to be different.

            • silent_water [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              fascism as an ideology is still at it’s core a defense of capitalism. liberalism has many flavors but it includes everything that exists to support, reinforce, and defend the capitalist project. fascism is only different in that the violence liberalism wreaks in the colonies are turned inwards, towards the nations of the imperial core. but violence itself is a central pillar of all ideologies and it does not differentiate liberalism from fascism.

              • @LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                -11 year ago

                It’s actually embarrassing seeing what garbage the human race has produced where we actively try to regress instead of progress… but yeah, whatever helps you sleep at night sweetheart. 😂

              • @LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                -31 year ago

                It’s actually embarrassing seeing what garbage the human race has produced where we actively try to regress instead of progress… but yeah, whatever helps you sleep at night sweetheart. 😂

                  • @LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -11 year ago

                    Welcome, stupid! Nowhere in my comments did I say I was against mask wearing, and I am actually for it and do it in my own life. Reading comprehension is hard. :(

                • Kuori [she/her]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  91 year ago

                  between your casual disdain for the lives of disabled people and your love of eugenicist rhetoric, i don’t think you understand how little your opinion matters to me, nazi scumfuck

          • P03 Locke
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            fascism and liberalism are two sides of the capitalist coin

            Oh, look, a HexBear dipshit in the wild! I wonder how we can figure them out so easily!

            This is “both sides are bad” bullshit, a destructive force from apathetic people. Don’t listen to this shit. Vote every year, twice a year!

            • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              401 year ago

              The people pointing out both sides have dogshit covid policy are not the ones not being apathetic. It’s the liberals who all went back to brunch and demanded everything re-open.

              • RustyVenture [none/use name]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                171 year ago

                Gaslighting is telling people that Covid isn’t a threat even though you know it’s not and you deliberately cooked the books to sell that delusion. Gaslighting is telling people you’re supposed to be responsible for governing that a vaccine that was never shown to stop the spread of a disease does, in fact, do that. Gaslighting is telling people that you must personally assess your own risk to a collective, public health crisis with the paltry tools that have been provided, then strip away or sabotage every last one of those tools so they cannot provide even a sliver of usefulness to anyone but the most bad faith interpretations.

                All of these things are things both Amerikkka’s fascist wing and liberal, fascist-enabling wing have done and are currently doing (if they’re not outright ignoring it). To anyone with a pulse, there is no meaningful difference, and indeed they are so often intertwined.

                Also, Marx was based.

              • P03 Locke
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re gaslighting. His post was bookended with political critiques on how fascism and liberalism are the same thing, with a poor attempt to use COVID to prove his point.

                Also, he’s a Marxist, a political ideology so successful, it’s produced countless fascist regimes.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  331 year ago

                  I am once again asking liberals to learn that ‘fascist’ isn’t just a synonym for ‘something I don’t like.’

                  • i think one of the aspects of fascism that really freaks out liberals is that fascism is the return of the policies they (casually or explicitly) support overseas to their homes and applied to them and their neighbors. i was reading that post-colonial analysis excerpt about how hitler did to the core what “heroic” churchill and his predecessors had been doing to india and other peoples/nations for decades. libs avoid any material analysis of the core/periphery or fascism because the connections make it obvious libs have no trouble enjoying the fruits of evil done elsewhere to secure markets, but bringing those same methods of repression and control home is the unspeakably evil act of a madman.

                    the idea that their poorly-interrogated political project creates and necessitates the very monster they fear is too much to grapple with for some.

                  • LiberalSoCalist
                    link
                    fedilink
                    181 year ago

                    Hannah Arendt and her (quite literally) Nazi-loving ass have been a disaster for political discussion in the anglosphere

                • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  311 year ago

                  You’re gaslighting

                  Don’t use technical terms if you don’t understand what they mean. It makes you look either ignorant or dishonest depending on your tone.

                  I’m gonna go with ignorant in this case.

                • duderium [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  281 year ago

                  Also, he’s a Marxist, a political ideology so successful, it’s produced countless fascist regimes.

                  Remind me who funded the Nazis before WW2 began and then rescued them at its end. Then remind me who was conquering Berlin while Hitler was committing suicide.

                • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  241 year ago

                  You’re gaslighting.

                  he’s a Marxist, a political ideology so successful, it’s produced countless fascist regimes.

                  Ironic, you should probably space out your protests about gaslighting a bit from your own fabrication of history.

                  It was third-way anti-communists who were the the base of movements that turned into fascist governments and it was Marxists that famously liberated Europe from that fascism.

                  Regardless, liberals broadly have enforced covid policy that is extremely harmful to people with disabilities. That’s essentially an admission that their right to participate in society is measured by their ‘value’, that dealing with a pandemic properly has to take a back seat to what’s good for the economy.

            • Kuori [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              321 year ago

              Vote every year, twice a year!

              lmao this really is all politics is to shitlibs

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s more than two political ideologies. The person you’re replying to isn’t talking about American political parties.

              There’s a lot of history and theory about how different ideologies, especially liberalism and fascism, interact with each other. This is what they were making reference to.

            • duderium [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The fact that we care about life more than the blood altar of capital tends to make it easy to find us. And remember: losing ideological battles online is but a prelude to losing such battles in the real world.

              Edit: imagine thinking that voting every few years for bourgeois puppets equals democracy. Real democracy is practiced in every home, school, and workplace every day by every person. Liberals don’t want to hear this, though, because they tend to do poorly when everyone everywhere is able and willing to participate in a truly democratic society 😉

              If you want to really see how democratic the USA is, try forming a union in your workplace. Try protesting in a way that inconveniences capital. Try going to a city when you have no money or connections. Try speaking publicly about how Biden has given $75 billion+ to Ukrainian Nazis. Then see just how amazing and democratic life in the USA really is.

              And yes, both sides are definitely bad, as evidenced by the fact that by any objective measure, everything in the USA is worse than it was when Trump was president. But thankfully there’s a third side called Marxism. If it didn’t work and it was really such a failure, then you wouldn’t be panicking daily about China’s rise. And if China is not actually communist, I assume you would have no issue with the CPC taking over the USA, since the result would be the same, right? Whatever human rights issues they supposedly have pale in comparison to the multiple ongoing genocides perpetrated by the USA’s ruling class. The Iraq War alone—supported by both American liberals and fascists—is far worse than anything the Nazis in the CIA say that China has done.

            • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              101 year ago

              This is “both sides are bad” bullshit, a destructive force from apathetic people. Don’t listen to this shit. Vote every year, twice a year!

              Biden has been in office for almost four years. Abortion was banned under his watch. He could have prevented it by expanding the supreme court - he chose not to. He chose to let thousands of women suffer and die.

              Student loan forgiveness was promised by Biden - a promise he failed to deliver. Again, expanding the supreme court could have prevented this.

              Biden has done absolutely nothing to stand up to the military-industrial complex. He pulled out of Afghanistan, then almost immediately began sending billions in “lethal aid” to Ukraine.

              Biden has upheld the deportation laws at the Mexican border that Trump put in place. He is actively choosing to do that!

              I don’t understand how any rational person can look at Biden and say he’s doing anything even slightly left-wing. He is not. Objective reality shows is that both sides (Democrats and Republicans) ARE the same because they are DOING the same thing. Ideology says they are different. Reality says they are the same. If you believe they are different, you are valuing ideology over reality.

            • Farman [any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              Its not a both sides are bad. Its an academic discussion about the genealogy of facism. And when you look at protofacist regimes like the young turks its very clear their ideology has a basis in liberalism.

            • Bnova [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Thank you, I will vote at least a dozen times in at least a dozen counties just for you. Be the change you want to see in the world.

            • @Shortstack@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Man I was reading his comment and I was like what is this whataboutism nonsense he’s talking about, then it made sense when I read your comment. Guess I gotta start looking at usernames again before reading comments

              • duderium [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                241 year ago

                Guess you need to put down the Harry Potter and read actual theory/history before discussing topics about which you are willfully ignorant.

          • ɠισƚԋҽϝʅσɯ
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            despite the fact that 2/3 of covid deaths occurred while Biden was office

            yea yea fuck capitalism, eat the rich, etc., but this “statistic” is disingenuously presented. The pandemic has existed for much more of Biden’s elected years than Trump’s. If your only criterion is that we’ll pretend both prezs were equally apathetic (they weren’t). Do we have to count the years for you? Don’t let ideology make you forget basic arithmetic.

            • duderium [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The pandemic has existed for much more of Biden’s elected years than Trump’s.

              Wow I wonder how that could be 🤔. It’s almost as though Biden’s covid “policy” has been criminally ineffective! He can’t even claim credit for the development of the vaccines, since Operation Warp Speed began under Trump!

              Biden said that he would listen to the scientists, but forgot to add that they would be eugenicists 😉

            • TheOtherwise [none/use name]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Biden literally said it was up to the states to deal with…which is partly what liberals were upset with trump for–not having a cohesive federal response

            • RustyVenture [none/use name]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 year ago

              Nothing disingenuous about it. Biden’s entire shtick was about following the science and doing the right thing (and being able to win over Republicans on controversial issues, that was the whole reason why we couldn’t gamble on anyone else) and he almost immediately tossed that out and adopted his predecessor’s “ignore it and it’ll go away” attitude. The White House pushed a vax-only approach which was proven to be ineffective before he even took office and then went out to brunch. For fuck’s sake, the man had to be publicly shamed into sending out masks and tests during a surge his feckless ass engendered because he pretended the pandemic was over in April 2021, when less than half of the adult population got their first round of shots.

              I’d be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt considering how poorly even the states that did give half a fuck in 2020 were managing and there is no doubt that it is a complex job, but once you start mimicking the guy you lambasted a few months prior for exacerbating the problem (not to mention spending the next year and a half prematurely stripping people of basic protections and the ability to reliably test and track within their own communities), you lost what little sympathy I could muster. For all intents and purposes, he owns all of the deaths from the day he stepped into the Oval Office. Worst of all, it’s both set the tone for how future leaders will be able to respond to crises, as well as reinforced the notion that our government is ontologically incapable of providing anything for its own citizens besides more terror.

              As for which one of these shitstains is more apathetic: Trump gave me more cash (and it wasn’t means-tested), suspended my student loan payments, afforded me a rent moratorium if I had lost my job, and didn’t end federal mask or testing mandates for traveling because his buddy at Delta Airlines whined to him in a letter. Nothing spells “apathy” like going on 60 Minutes amid yet another surge in cases and saying “the pandemic is over,” or cutting off extended UI prematurely, or instructing cities to use their unused Covid funds to give to the pigs.

              If Trump was smart enough to even utter the words “wear a mask” at any point in 2020 he would still be in office today. This is not an endorsement, for the record. I don’t doubt Trump would have done all of this and worse eventually as well, but the difference is that his callousness was consistently met with resistance and vocal opposition. For Joe Biden, whose callousness is every bit as harmful, there is no effective resistance, no organized campaign to combat the president’s anti-science blathering. We all have to get over it and live even more precariously in this shithole lest we be accused of helping Trump win again.

              • @Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Trump was actually very pro mask at the beginning of the pandemic until the CDC told him they didn’t have enough stock for everyone. The CDC first said not to mask up so that they could secure enough supplies for government workers. This is all recorded fact.

                • silent_water [she/her]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  it was before the right turned it into a culture war issue. the CDC, then as repeatedly since, has blood on their hands - we knew it was an airborne respiratory illness and still they put out bad public policy that backfired tremendously.

    • @Piers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah, you’re probably right. They see someone wearing a mask, they feel bad, they decide the person wearing the mask made them feel bad.