• @lemmm5ter@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 days ago

    pretty sure you can’t end homelessness with $20b unless we’re talking about absolute homelessness or something…

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 days ago

      pretty sure you can’t end homelessness with $20b

      The math is straightforward: Cost of a housing unit * number of unhoused people. Even assuming the extraordinarily inflated market rate for housing in 2024, $20B is more than enough to house 650k people.

      Now, will the institutional actors that produced homelessness stop existing? Will we see an end to predatory lenders, robo-signed foreclosures, police harassment and civil asset forfeiture of the working poor, and unregulated real estate scammers targeting our most vulnerable neighbors? Probably not.

      But we wouldn’t have so many billionaires running about squandering our national wealth on vanity projects like Twitter without billions to be fleeced from the public to begin with.

      • @IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        62 days ago

        $20B is more than enough to house 650k people

        I got curious, so I whipped out my phone’s calculator. $20B/650k = $30,800, give or take. I truly don’t know if that’s enough to break the cycle of homelessness, but if it is that seems like a pretty low number. We spend 40x that number on the defense budget, which is totally a jobs program but it seems like fighting homelessness would also ultimately be a jobs program.