@blueskyposter to Bluesky@lemmy.world • 21 days agobUT iT PaYs bACk iN ToUriSMimagemessage-square68arrow-up1763arrow-down120
arrow-up1743arrow-down1imagebUT iT PaYs bACk iN ToUriSM@blueskyposter to Bluesky@lemmy.world • 21 days agomessage-square68
minus-square@feedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•20 days agoMaybe it does pay back in tourism? Either way let’s have the social housing as well.
minus-square@Klear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•20 days agoTourism pays even without the royals. Just look at Versailles.
minus-square@feedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-2•20 days agoIn which case the taxpayer would still be paying to renovate Buckingham Palace. What’s he going to do, sell it? Let us keep our pet family.
minus-square@feedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•20 days agooh right well in that case just clean up after yourselves
Maybe it does pay back in tourism? Either way let’s have the social housing as well.
Tourism pays even without the royals. Just look at Versailles.
How much does a guillotine cost again?
Buck o’ five.
In which case the taxpayer would still be paying to renovate Buckingham Palace. What’s he going to do, sell it? Let us keep our pet family.
You are the pets.
That would imply they feed me, etc.
LMAO
No.
oh right well in that case just clean up after yourselves
No, it’s one or the other!