• @frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -93 days ago

    If it’s California that’s legally required. I know bicyclists in California are unfamiliar with the concept of laws, but that’s how they work.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 days ago

      There’s a dotted line when a car lane crosses a bike lane. That is not in every intersection. I agree we need to standardize and dummy proof stuff more but there’s only so much you can do with drivers who think it’s okay to turn the shoulder into an extra lane during a highway backup.

    • @orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      woe is you thinking the bike lane is anything more than an extended turn lane, especially outside of California.

      we should all be more like Frayedpickles here and mow down the bikes in the bike only lane, teach them that they should keep their weak aluminum a-frames off our glorious car lanes.

      • ✺roguetrick✺
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I don’t get this reaction. Cars should be in the bike lane for turning because after dooring the most common way to get injured is getting hooked by a turning car. Where I live we don’t really have bike lanes, but when you do have them cars don’t tend to look for you passing and turn as soon as they are signaled to do so.

        • @orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          just like school shootings, this seems to not be an issue in the rest of the world.