• @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    225 days ago

    No, it’s terror. It’s just that that isn’t always the negative we’ve tended to think it is.

    Typically we’ve been citizens in a country on the “power” side of the dynamic, so using terror like that meant using it on us, and so we learned that it’s bad.

    This time we’re on the other side of the power dynamic, so it’s seemingly… Good.

    The bad thing being good creates cognitive dissonance.

    • @supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is a direct consequence of “the war on terror” attempting to redefine the military strategy of asymmetrical warfare as terrorism and inherently immoral.

      To sell the bullshit “war on terror” the easiest way to make the US seem righteous was to degrade the public’s sense of why people violently resist and reduce it to the act of violently resisting an organized traditional military is immoral unless the thing resisting is also a traditional organized military.

      I am glad that narrative is breaking down though as the distortion of how and why violent conflicts occur is dangerously blinding to a basic understanding of the world.