• @rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 days ago

    Most of those run OpenWrt or PfSense. Assuming the hardware is well-supported by the open source software it runs, there’s a argument to be made that there’s no difference. There’s always the risk of them using some weird chipset that won’t be supported in a year’s time. The only difference is that the OpenWrt One is specifically designed for OpenWrt with well-supported hardware.

    • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      how good is openwrt these days? i used it a long time ago on tp link hardware are remember it was not too good…like adding own scripts, addons etc. and then i tried stuff like ipfire,ipcop and pfsense. pfsense was so much better and now opensense is quite good. how does current openwrt compare?

      • @philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        OPNsense is like comparing a bicycle to a car (in Europe) Both will get you there,the first one is more convenient most of the time for most users,but the second one is a whole class of “more powerful”. But it’s far easier to take a shortcut with a bike.

        • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          k. thanks. i really was thinking they made hughe progress now that they do dedicated hardware.

          • @Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 days ago

            They don’t, as others have pointed out. It’s just a standard single board computer with some addons and a case.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        I’ve been using it on my last 2 routers, currently the Netgear WAX206 and I’m loving it.

        It does what it’s supposed to. No complaints.