• @Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2919 hours ago

        I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

        • @General_Effort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          816 hours ago

          Facebook/Meta has developed software to estimate the age from a video.

          I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

          Comes with the territory. The point is to control who has access to what information so that they don’t get wrong ideas.

          • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 hours ago

            Trusting your face to Facebook is just as terrifying, thanks.

            (Plus I have concerns as someone who still looks teenage in her 20s)

          • Dr. Moose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            910 hours ago

            if you think AI software will be able to differentiate between a 15 year old and 16 year old then I have this cool bridge in Brooklyn that you might be interested in.

            This is delusional to the point where it feels like we’re literally devolving.

        • @JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 hours ago

          I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

          The senate inquiry outlined the two likely solutions :

          1. Uploading ID to the website.

          2. 3D face scanning. This will include continual monitoring so if another person comes into view they will have to face scan in. Remember, its prohibited for chidren to even watch prohibited content with their parents.

          • @copd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            312 hours ago

            How can it possibly be legal to 3D face scan a child, especially if it needs to be authenticated by a remote server somewhere.

            I can only ever see option 1 working

        • @Wooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          A large part of this will help maintain liability for harm to young people. How ages is verified is irrelevant

        • @Clanket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -116 hours ago

          Problematic for who, the tech companies? They’re practically printing money. Let them spend it on actual solutions to issues that are causing problems for the World.

          • Dr. Moose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 hours ago

            it’s not a problem that can be solved by tech.

          • @Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            716 hours ago

            It forces them to implement solutions that make having anonymous accounts impossible.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            016 hours ago

            Problematic for the children who are having their rights taken away. This change bans children from connecting with their friends in other countries, other states, and even other cities.

            Even something as simple as hopping in a voice call with your squad to play Deep Rock Galactic is now illegal for 15 year olds. That’s ridiculous. The fact that they can break the law is great, but they shouldn’t have to break the law in order to do something so harmless.

            What about using Zoom to speak to a doctor or therapist? What about contacting queer support resources through social media? What about using a text based suicide hotline? According to the law, that’s social media.