• IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5622 hours ago

    “I’m going to paint a shitty picture” … while using enough electricity to power a small town for two months

      • @anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        712 hours ago

        Yes, thankfully the reasonable tech companies offering these services have decided to stop the training process after it was done once. The insane increase in energy consumption and hardware manufacturing for datacenter components and accelerators is purely coincidental and has nothing to do with demand for gimmicky generative AI services. Let’s also conveniently ignore the increasing inference cost of more complex models, while we’re at it.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      2520 hours ago

      Surprised to hear that my graphics card consumes enough electricity to power a small town for two months in the second it takes for it to generate an image. I’m getting incredibly good electricity rates if so.

    • SolacefromSilence
      link
      fedilink
      1720 hours ago

      Really though, I just went through a rabbit hole of confirming a single BTC transaction uses more than 700 KWH, that’s 3 months electricity to me!

      • @Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        513 hours ago

        A single BTC transaction uses 700kWh of electricity? I’d like to see those documents too now because that doesn’t sound right at all.

      • @tomcatt360@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1017 hours ago

        I feel like most of the articles saying this are confusing the mining power usage (a constant load) with the transaction power usage. (Essentially nothing) Each transaction fee does incentivise more mining, but it’s not a flat power cost per transaction.