@Gork@lemm.ee to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 day agoQuite an explosive finishfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down14
arrow-up1510arrow-down1imageQuite an explosive finishfiles.catbox.moe@Gork@lemm.ee to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 day agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-square@Atomic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish14•10 hours agoThat’s a reason for then not now. Better question is then why didn’t Germany stick with the old design instead of switching to more “modern” looking grenades? And the answer is NOT “baseball”. The answer is that they’re too heavy and cumbersome. And the cons outweighs the pros.
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-25 hours agoThe answer is it simplified NATO logistics Pray we don’t simplify it further
That’s a reason for then not now.
Better question is then why didn’t Germany stick with the old design instead of switching to more “modern” looking grenades?
And the answer is NOT “baseball”. The answer is that they’re too heavy and cumbersome. And the cons outweighs the pros.
The answer is it simplified NATO logistics
Pray we don’t simplify it further