• Tankiedesantski [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    Two Jews meet on the U-Bahn in 1935. One is reading a Nazi newspaper. His friend asks him “how can you read those outrageous lies about us?!” He replies “If I read a real newspaper, its persecution this and deportation that. But in this paper? We own all the banks, the movies, the government!”

    • @boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Classic but red flag (lol) conspiracy theory vibes in this context. Jewish people owning China or vice versa? Either way fits more in line with qanonists

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 year ago

        God could the point go over your head harder. That user wasn’t engaging in a conspiracy theory that Jews on all the banks movies and government, they were comparing your apparent belief that the Chinese government controls the American government to those antisemitic conspiracy theories.

        Also zero points in an argument with a bunch of people who can’t downvote farquaad-point

          • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You know what, it’s not even apparent, you explicitly stated it:

            China’s red-blue man owns US’s red and blue men anyway.

            disgost

            • @boredtortoise@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s actually a looong leap from the known China-sponsored politicians to antisemitic cabal conspiracy theories

              • I think that in 30 years you’ll be considered the anti-Semite of this age, honestly. Sartre once famously claimed something like “if the Nazi didn’t have the jew, they would have created him.”

                Sartre, for all his faults, understood that fascism always needed the external and periphery, whether defined geographically or ethnically, in order to sustain itself through expropriation. Who this was doesn’t matter as much as that this group is defined as having more than it deserves for bad reasons and is therefore justifiable as a victim of violent expropriation. The values represented have become more progressive™ in that you believe China owns American representatives in order to mistreat Muslims or something. But materially it’s identical to “Judeo-Bolshevik” antisemitism

                Here’s a bite-sized analysis from a guy who’s pretty good at this:

                https://twitter.com/RodericDay/status/1495054681579692035?t=gmJyzLx5go9hZWcFJkt5fw&s=19