Summary

Donald Trump’s transition team has bypassed standard FBI background checks for key cabinet nominees, relying instead on private investigators, as reported by CNN.

This breaks decades-old norms meant to vet candidates for criminal history and conflicts of interest.

Controversial appointees include Matt Gaetz (attorney general), Tulsi Gabbard (director of national intelligence), and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (health secretary), all facing scrutiny for past investigations, pro-Russian views, or personal admissions.

Critics argue Trump seeks to undermine traditional vetting, with potential security risks tied to bypassing these checks.

  • @whithom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    1211 day ago

    We will take whatever he gives. The US voters approved him. They want this. They chose this, and everything that comes from it.

    • @Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      13 hours ago

      He got more votes than he ever did in the previous elections, and won the popular vote for the first time. God damn.

    • @GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      771 day ago

      This. There is no authority above the authoritarian. His word is law now. Whatever Our Glorious Cheeto wishes is now US doctrine.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      This is why we’re supposed to have separation of powers. Any competent senate, even if the same party would insist in this before confirming. A senate full of sycophants on the other hand ….

    • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 day ago

      Thats not true. There are at least 71 million people here who voted against it. Thats a lot of people.

      • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 hours ago

        There were even more who couldn’t be bothered to get off their asses and vote at all. They stood by and allowed this to happen without caring enough to try and stop it.

        • @zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          I have a friend who says “I’m not political” and I’m just what? So you don’t have any opinion on whether immigrants should get fucked or gay people should have rights? His position is “I see so many families and friends torn apart by disagreements so I’m just not political”. Okay. It makes me think he’s kind of a dolt. I don’t feel like it’s possible to not have an opinion on social issues at the least.

        • @ReCursing
          link
          88 hours ago

          …Assuming he actually did, and didn’t just commit all the electoral fraud he kept talking about

          • @zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 hours ago

            Plenty of voter suppression in swing states, like unenrolling people from voter registration lists. Also the ongoing issues like 4 hour lines in urban areas, due to not enough voting facilities and machines, and short or no lines in rural areas and suburbs. Also, how it’s easier for people with certain types of jobs to go vote but hourly workers etc have a harder time getting there since voting day isn’t a holiday.