• @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m more of a stickler for accuracy, consistency and intention,

    Same thing. Most people find it abrasive and unnatural, but I can roll this way too.

    you were defending the reasoning for global genocide(I know you’re whistling a different tune in later comments, I’m talking about why I refuted your earlier defense of genocide)

    Please quote the earlier defense of genocide.

    • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      “Please quote the earlier defense of genocide.”

      it’s kind of long, but sure.

      bear in mind that the topic is global genocide, the context to your comment is my disagreement that global genocide is justified, and you are arguing that cthulhu’s reasoning is valid:

      "…the only counter to this is that we’ve toned down the war, slavery and brutal exploitation over the last 200 years. The last 10,000 before that and probably the last 200,000 before that are kind of the same thing happening over and over again. What’s more, nobody can adequately explain why it’s suddenly started to improve, or if it will stay that way. For all we know, we live in the turbulent transition period between agrarian hereditary autocracy and dystopian high-tech hereditary autocracy.

      All in all, humanity is (morally) shit…

      you further claim that humanity is shit by humanity’s standards, but are speaking only for yourself and by your own reasoning, thereby identifying your own personal and singular standards, rather than “humanity’s”.

      you have robustly defended the reasoning for global genocide.