• @Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    84 days ago
    1. If you think a horse has the environmental impact of an automobile, I have a bridge to sell you

    2. Horses aren’t cows

    • @Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      124 days ago

      I mean you’re not wrong but no matter how small an impact it’s still not ZERO emissions, so the guy you’re replying to is technically correct.

      • @Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -74 days ago

        Ah yes, good ole technically correct, the weakest and most schlubby shade of correct, whatever would we do without it?

        • @Mercuri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          84 days ago

          Actually, it’s the best kind of correct. But hey, don’t let all that butt hurt bother you. I hear there’s a cream for that.

          I love that I agreed with you and you STILL felt aggrieved, lol.

          • @Godric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -24 days ago

            Jokes on you, clown, I’m never butt-hurt, only butt-turned-on!

            Disdaining the “technically correct” pedants is freeing, try it sometime, you might like it ;)

    • @Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Look at how much calories a horse needs per day, and then look at how much CO2 gets emitted to produce said food. Even the amount of CO2 a horse exhales per day is already significant.