Title

  • @kobra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only if people voluntarily give up their privacy and switch to a threads account/app, right? I mean ultimately the argument is that Meta will develop features so cool that we’ll all give up our privacy for them?

    Idk, it just seems like if that’s the fear, I think it will happen regardless and even defederating won’t really stop that. I feel like people will just make new accounts wherever the cool place to be is.

    I’m all for defederating just because you don’t want to see or associate with that content though, that totally make sense.

    • Craigerade
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Well, Meta said it already has 53 million sign ups for threads.

      • @kobra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        why do you think they care enough about the comparatively tiny amount here in the fediverse to do the whole embrace-extinguish stuff?

        • Nepenthe
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Same reason Spez is still doing damage control over 3% of his userbase leaving, up to and including signing up more bots to boost traffic and denounce the protests. It’s not like he’s losing a whole lot, he’s kept multimillions of users (human and otherwise) to make his shareholders happy and his site will stumble along pretty ok for years. But in capitalism, especially the ad-driven digital sphere, eyes are everything.

          Federating with the rest of us IS a blip in the grand scheme, but so was 3%. The fediverse existing outside of Threads carries the very significant risk that their users will sign up for their service and see the other platforms that are just as nice without being ad-soaked, subscription-based, and demanding your real name while they sell every ounce of your info.

          One of us is going to be leeching users from the other and meta will not like this, so they’re liable to make damn sure it’s them. It wouldn’t really shock me to see them neglect to upkeep federation with non-meta instances while they attempt to charm users away with a recognizable, high-traffic platform full of bells and whistles.

        • jorge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          EEE doesn’t need to be an intentional attack. They only seek profit.

          • It is profitable to adapt an already mature protocol like XMPP or ActivityPub instead of creating their own from scratch (BlueSky is creating their own protocol, and they’re still in beta and probably will never catch up to Threads because of this).
          • It is profitable to create new features that increase the engagement of the users. And since they don’t care for the community, only for themselves, these features are never released as open source and incorporated into the protocol.
          • And if it’s profitable to wall their instance (like WhatsApp using XMPP but not federating with anyone else) or to close it (like Google killing Google Talk), they will do it. They will not care if their actions negatively affect the rest of the fediverse.
          • Terrasque
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You know Facebook has released a ton as open source, right?

            Edit: ever heard of React? Facebook. Pytorch? Facebook. GraphQL? Facebook. Llama? Facebook. Plus a ton of more niche stuff. Zstd, relay, fresco, hydra, redex, React native…

            Edit2: https://github.com/facebook

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          The fediverse is virgin soil, Meta trying to get there before others is expectable, if only to poison the wells.

      • PupBiru
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        their data will (maybe) be available, but as far as actual features threads is a whole different thing

        think of it like kbin and lemmy: we can interact between them, but if lemmy adds a feature kbin doesn’t get it

        so if threads adds a feature, mastodon and the rest of the fediverse doesn’t automatically get it

        actually pinned posts i think is a good example for kbin and lemmy: they both have pinned posts, but they’re slightly different and therefor don’t operate correctly together

      • Ignacio
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Only if Threads is open source, but it doesn’t seem to be.