🃏Joker to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month ago‘It’s not close’ - Israel committing genocide concludes Wikipedia ending editorial debatewww.middleeastmonitor.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1708arrow-down130cross-posted to: palestine@lemmygrad.mlworldnews@lemmy.mltechnology@midwest.social
arrow-up1678arrow-down1external-link‘It’s not close’ - Israel committing genocide concludes Wikipedia ending editorial debatewww.middleeastmonitor.com🃏Joker to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square85fedilinkcross-posted to: palestine@lemmygrad.mlworldnews@lemmy.mltechnology@midwest.social
minus-square@jonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish14•1 month agoUnfortunately they can’t quote Wikipedia directly in their work, but they can use the sources in the article.
minus-square@jagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoWut? I think the South African report is the source for Wikipedia.
minus-square@jonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 month agoIt’s a joke about how you can’t quote Wikipedia directly in papers, etc.
minus-square@GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoI imagine you actually could count their ruling as it’s an original work, based on research from other papers. Which I find kind of funny, because that would mess up so many professors…
Unfortunately they can’t quote Wikipedia directly in their work, but they can use the sources in the article.
Wut? I think the South African report is the source for Wikipedia.
It’s a joke about how you can’t quote Wikipedia directly in papers, etc.
I imagine you actually could count their ruling as it’s an original work, based on research from other papers. Which I find kind of funny, because that would mess up so many professors…